Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35215759›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Micro-Scale Shear Kneading-Gluten Network Development under Multiple Stress-Relaxation Steps and Evaluation via Multiwave Rheology.

Leonhard Maria Vidal, Andre Braun, Mario Jekle, Thomas Becker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leonhard Maria VidalResearch Group Cereal Technology and Process Engineering, Institute of Brewing and Beverage Technology, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Andre BraunAnton Paar Germany GmbH, 73760 Ostfildern, Germany.
Mario JekleDepartment of Plant-Based Foods, Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2560-0040
Thomas BeckerResearch Group Cereal Technology and Process Engineering, Institute of Brewing and Beverage Technology, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.

Funding

German Ministry of Economics and Technology (via AIF) and the FEI (Forschungskreis der Ernährungsindustrie e. V., Bonn AiF 20227 N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the kneading process of wheat flour dough, the state of the art is a subsequent and static measuring step on kneaded dough samples. In this study, an in-line measurement setup was set up in a rheometer based on previously validated shear kneading processes. With this approach, the challenge of sample transfer between the kneader and a measurement device was overcome. With the developed approach, an analysis of the dynamic development of the dough is possible. Through consecutive stress-relaxation steps with increasing deformation, a kneading setup in a conventional rheometer is implemented. Fitting of the shear stress curve with a linearization approach, as well as fitting of the relaxation modulus after each kneading step, is a new way to evaluate the matrix development. Subsequently, multiwave rheology is used to validate the kneading process in-line. The shear kneading setup was capable of producing an optimally developed dough matrix close to the reference kneading time of 150 ± 7.9 s (n = 3). The linearization approach as well as the power-law fit of the relaxation modulus revealed gluten network development comparable to the reference dough. With this approach, a deeper insight into gluten network development and crosslinking processes during wheat flour dough kneading is given.

Indexed as

dough developmentprotein networkrheologyshear kneadingwheat dough

Identifiers

PMID35215759
PMCPMC8963076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.