Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35565694›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Nutritional Intake and Biomarker Status in Strict Raw Food Eaters.

Klaus Abraham, Iris Trefflich, Fabian Gauch, Cornelia Weikert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Klaus AbrahamDepartment of Food Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1895-9909
Iris TrefflichDepartment of Food Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1229-1816
Fabian GauchDepartment of Food Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
Cornelia WeikertDepartment of Food Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1756-0146
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following a strict raw food diet (primarily based on fresh fruit and raw vegetables, waiving any consumption of heated or processed food) has the risk of undersupply of energy and certain macro- and micronutrients. In this cross-sectional study, we compared 16 non-smoking strict raw food eaters (5 women and 11 men, age 44.6 ± 12.3 years, duration of following the diet 11.6 ± 10.8 years) with the non-smoking participants (32 vegans, 27 omnivores) of the "Risk and Benefits of a Vegan Diet" (RBVD) study. We investigated body composition, dietary intake from 3-day weighed food records, and relevant fasting blood and serum parameters. Food choice and dietary behavior were very heterogenic in raw food eaters. They had lower mean values of BMI and percentage of body fat than the respective RBVD participants. The same holds true for energy supply and intakes of protein, carbohydrate, calcium and iodine. Serum levels revealed lower levels of HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, zinc, and vitamin D3. The raw food eaters with (

Indexed as

Diet, VegetarianRaw FoodsAdultBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesDietEatingFemaleHumansMaleMicronutrientsMiddle AgedNutritional StatusVitamin B 12BiomarkersMicronutrientsVitamin B 123-day weighed food recordbiomarkerenergy supplyhomocysteineomnivoresstrict raw food dietvegansvitamin B12

Identifiers

PMID35565694
PMCPMC9105765
OpenAlexW4224313684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.