Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33557299›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

High-Throughput Screening and Characterization of Phenolic Compounds in Stone Fruits Waste by LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS and Their Potential Antioxidant Activities.

Yili Hong, Zening Wang, Colin J Barrow, Frank R Dunshea, Hafiz A R Suleria

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nutraceutical Profile Characterization in Apricot (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biomedical reports · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. From Biorefinery to Food Product Design: Peach (Food and bioprocess technology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yili HongSchool of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Zening WangSchool of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Colin J BarrowCentre for Chemistry and Biotechnology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3217, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2153-7267
Frank R DunsheaSchool of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3998-1240
Hafiz A R SuleriaSchool of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2450-0830
Deakin University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

University of Melbourne Faculty Research Initiative Funds - UoM -19/20University of Melbourne McKenzie Fellowship Scheme - UoM-18/21University of Melbourne Richard WS Nicholas Agricultural Science Scholarship - UoM-20/21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stone fruits, including peach (

Indexed as

fruit wasteHPLC-PDALC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MSphenolic compoundsstone fruits

Identifiers

PMID33557299
PMCPMC7914583
OpenAlexW3127637497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.