Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30886245›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Definition of network types - Prediction of dough mechanical behaviour under shear by gluten microstructure.

Isabelle Lucas, Hannes Petermeier, Thomas Becker, Mario Jekle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isabelle LucasTechnical University of Munich, Institute of Brewing and Beverage Technology, Research Group Cereal Technology and Process Engineering, 85354, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6842-6129
Hannes PetermeierTechnical University of Munich, Chair of Mathematical Modelling of Biological Systems, 85748, Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5607-6694
Thomas BeckerTechnical University of Munich, Institute of Brewing and Beverage Technology, Research Group Cereal Technology and Process Engineering, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Mario JekleTechnical University of Munich, Institute of Brewing and Beverage Technology, Research Group Cereal Technology and Process Engineering, 85354, Freising, Germany. mjekle@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2560-0040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study defines network types of wheat gluten to describe spatial arrangements of gluten networks in relation to dough mechanical behaviour. To achieve a high variety in gluten arrangements, ten specific and unspecific gluten-modifying agents in increasing concentrations were added to wheat dough. Gluten microstructure was visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy and quantified by protein network analysis. Dough rheological behaviour was determined by both oscillatory and creep-recovery tests. Based on correlation matrices and principal component analysis, six different network types were identified and associated to their rheological characteristics: a cleaved (low viscous), rigid (highly viscous), spread (viscoelastic), strengthened (viscoelastic), particulate and dense (highly viscous) or particulate and loose (low viscous) network. Furthermore, rheological dough properties of specifically gluten-modified samples were predicted with five microstructural gluten attributes (lacunarity, branching rate, end-point rate, protein width, average protein length) and assigned properly by the obtained partial least square model with an accuracy up to 90% (e.g., R

Identifiers

PMID30886245
PMCPMC6423116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.