Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29299825›Full record

ArticleMycotoxin research2018

Monitoring of ochratoxin A and ochratoxin-producing fungi in traditional salami manufactured in Northern Italy.

C Merla, G Andreoli, C Garino, N Vicari, G Tosi, M L Guglielminetti, A Moretti, A Biancardi, M Arlorio, M Fabbi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycotoxin research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Risk assessment of ochratoxin A in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

C MerlaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "B. Ubertini", Sezione Diagnostica di Pavia, Strada Campeggi 59/61, 27100, Pavia, Italy. cristiname87@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2986-6644
G AndreoliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "B. Ubertini", Sezione Diagnostica di Pavia, Strada Campeggi 59/61, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
C GarinoDipartimento di Scienze del Farmaco & Drug and Food Biotechnology (DFB) Center, Università del Piemonte Orientale "A. Avogadro", Largo Donegani 2, 28100, Novara, Italy.
N VicariIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "B. Ubertini", Sezione Diagnostica di Pavia, Strada Campeggi 59/61, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
G TosiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "B. Ubertini", Sezione Diagnostica di Forlì, Via don Eugenio Servadei 3/E-3/F, 47122, Forlì, Italy.
M L GuglielminettiDipartimento di Scienze della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Università di Pavia - Laboratorio di Micologia, Via S. Epifanio 14, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
A MorettiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "B. Ubertini", Laboratorio Micotossine e Tossicologia, Via Bianchi 9, 25124, Brescia, Italy.
A BiancardiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "B. Ubertini", Laboratorio Micotossine e Tossicologia, Via Bianchi 9, 25124, Brescia, Italy.
M ArlorioDipartimento di Scienze del Farmaco & Drug and Food Biotechnology (DFB) Center, Università del Piemonte Orientale "A. Avogadro", Largo Donegani 2, 28100, Novara, Italy.
M FabbiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "B. Ubertini", Sezione Diagnostica di Pavia, Strada Campeggi 59/61, 27100, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

Ministero della Salute IZSLER PRC 2013-021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungi have a crucial role in the correct maturation of salami, but special attention should be addressed to the production of the nephrotoxic, immunotoxic, and carcinogenic mycotoxin ochratoxin A (OTA). In a monitoring study conducted in Northern Italy, OTA was detected by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry in 13 out 133 samples of traditional salami (9.8% of the total count). Mycological analysis of these samples yielded 247 fungal isolates which were identified to species level. The most frequent species were Penicillium nalgiovense, P. solitum, and P. chrysogenum. P. nordicum, an OTA-producing species commonly found in proteinaceous food, was not found in these samples. Three isolates were found to be Aspergillus westerdijkiae, an OTA-producing species. In order to check the results of the microbiological identification, 19 different strains of Aspergillus and 94 of Penicillium were tested for the presence of a sequence common to OTA-producing fungi by real-time PCR. None of the studied isolates, including the three A. westerdijkiae, possessed the otanpsPN target which is common to OTA-producing strains. Two out of three isolates of the A. westerdijkiae were also PCR-negative for the otanpsPN gene and did not produce OTA in culture. Conversely, this target sequence was amplified from the DNA purified from 14 salami casings including three casings harboring A. westerdijkiae. The amplification of sequences specific for OTA-producing strains performed on total genomic DNA extracted directly from salami casings provided a more suitable approach than PCR analysis of isolates from salami for the OTA-related otanpsPN gene to evaluate the risk of OTA contamination.

Indexed as

Food AnalysisFood ContaminationFood MicrobiologyChromatography, LiquidDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFungiItalyMicrobiotaMycotoxinsOchratoxinsPenicilliumPolymerase Chain ReactionTandem Mass SpectrometryDNA, Ribosomal SpacerMycotoxinsochratoxin AOchratoxinsAspergillusMycotoxinOchratoxin AotanpsPN genePenicilliumSalami

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.