Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26787019›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2016

Effectiveness of problem-based learning in Chinese pharmacy education: a meta-analysis.

Jiyin Zhou, Shiwen Zhou, Chunji Huang, Rufu Xu, Zuo Zhang, Shengya Zeng, Guisheng Qian

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiyin ZhouNational Drug Clinical Trial Institution, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China. zhoujiyin@gmail.com.
Shiwen ZhouNational Drug Clinical Trial Institution, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China.
Chunji HuangNational Drug Clinical Trial Institution, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China.
Rufu XuNational Drug Clinical Trial Institution, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China.
Zuo ZhangNational Drug Clinical Trial Institution, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China.
Shengya ZengNational Drug Clinical Trial Institution, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China.
Guisheng QianInstitute of Respiratory Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China. qianguisheng@outlook.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis review provides a critical overview of problem-based learning (PBL) practices in Chinese pharmacy education. PBL has yet to be widely applied in pharmaceutical education in China. The results of those studies that have been conducted are published in Chinese and thus may not be easily accessible to international researchers. Therefore, this meta-analysis was carried out to review the effectiveness of PBL.

methodsDatabases were searched for studies in accordance with the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently performed the study identification and data extraction. A meta-analysis was conducted using Revman 5.3 software.

resultsSixteen randomized controlled trials were included. The meta-analysis revealed that PBL had a positive association with higher theoretical scores (SMD = 1.17, 95% CI [0.77, 11.57], P < 0.00001). The questionnaire results show that PBL methods are superior to conventional teaching methods in improving students' learning interest, independent analysis skills, scope of knowledge, self-study, team spirit, and oral expression.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis indicates that PBL pedagogy is superior to traditional lecture-based teaching in Chinese pharmacy education. PBL methods could be an optional, supplementary method of pharmaceutical teaching in China. However, Chinese pharmacy colleges and universities should revise PBL curricula according to their own needs, which would maximize the effectiveness of PBL.

Indexed as

ChinaEducational MeasurementEducation, PharmacyHumansProblem-Based LearningProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID26787019
PMCPMC4719679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.