Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22253968›Full record

ReviewNutrients2009

Animal nutrition and lipids in animal products and their contribution to human intake and health.

Ian Givens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect on Broiler Production Performance and Meat Quality of FeedingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  6. Recalcitrant cell wall ofAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Effect of Concentration of Flaxseed (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  9. Effect of DietaryAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ian GivensAnimal Sciences Research Group, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AR, UK. d.i.givens@reading.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few EU countries meet targets for saturated fatty acid (SFA) intake. Dairy products usually represent the single largest source of SFA, yet evidence indicates that milk has cardioprotective properties. Options for replacing some of the SFA in milk fat with cis-monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) through alteration of the cow's diet are examined. Also, few people achieve minimum recommended intakes (~450-500 mg/d) of the long chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Enrichment of EPA+DHA in poultry meat via bird nutrition is described and how this would impact on habitual intake is discussed.

Indexed as

DietAdolescentAdultAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolDairy ProductsDietary FatsDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic AcidEnergy IntakeEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedDietary FatsDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic Acidanimal nutritionlipids

Identifiers

PMID22253968
PMCPMC3257589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.