ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives1999
p53 induction as a genotoxic test for twenty-five chemicals undergoing in vivo carcinogenicity testing.
Article in Environmental health perspectives, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of mouthwashes containing different active ingredients on human gingival fibroblasts and their antimicrobial efficacy.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- The neuroprotective role of volatile oils: insights into chemical profiles, characteristics, neurochemical mechanisms, and preclinical studies in Alzheimer's disease.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
- Unlocking the Unique Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Acute and Subchronic Toxicity Assessment of Conventional SoxhletJournal of toxicology · 2023Article
- Toxicity of Selected Monoterpenes and Essential Oils Rich in These Compounds.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- p53 induction and cell viability modulation by genotoxic individual chemicals and mixtures.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018Article
- Article
- Quantitative analysis of fragrance and odorants released from fresh and decaying strawberries.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2013Article
- Multi-mycotoxin screening reveals the occurrence of 139 different secondary metabolites in feed and feed ingredients.Toxins · 2013Article
- Origins of injection-site sarcomas in cats: the possible role of chronic inflammation-a review.ISRN veterinary science · 2011Article
- Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 95 (FGE.95): Consideration of aliphatic, linear or branched-chain saturated and unsaturated alcohols, aldehydes, acids and related esters evaluated by JECFA (69EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2010Article
- Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 65 (FGE.65): Consideration of sulfur-substituted furan derivatives used as flavouring agents evaluated by JECFA (59th meeting) structurally related to a subgroup of substances within the group of "Furfuryl and furan derivatives with and without additional side-chain substituents and heteroatoms from chemical group 14" evaluated by EFSA in FGE.13Rev1 (2009).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2010Article
- A new transgenic mouse line to image chemically induced p53 activation in vivo.Cancer science · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vivo carcinogenicity testing is an expensive and time-consuming process, and as a result, only a relatively small fraction of new and existing chemicals has been tested in this manner. Therefore, the development and validation of alternative approaches is desirable. We previously developed a mammalian in vitro assay for genotoxicity based on the ability of cells to increase their level of the tumor-suppressor protein p53 in response to DNA damage. Cultured cells are treated with various amounts of the test substances, and at defined times following treatment, they are harvested and lysed. The lysates are analyzed for p53 by Western blot and/or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis. An increase in cellular p53 following treatment is interpreted as evidence for DNA damage. To determine the ability of this p53-induction assay to predict carcinogenicity in rodents and to compare such results with those obtained using alternate approaches, we subjected 25 chemicals from the predictive toxicology evaluation 2 list to analysis with this method. Five substances (citral, cobalt sulfate heptahydrate, D&C Yellow No. 11, oxymetholone, and t-butylhydroquinone) tested positive in this assay, and three substances (emodin, phenolphthalein, and sodium xylenesulfonate) tested as possibly positive. Comparisons between the results obtained with this assay and those obtained with the in vivo protocol, the Salmonella assay, and the Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell assay indicate that the p53-induction assay is an excellent predictor of the limited number of genotoxic carcinogens in this set, and that its accuracy is roughly equivalent to or better than the Salmonella and SHE assays for the complete set of chemicals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.