Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42721740›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Comparative effects of dietary lactic acid and formic acid supplementation on growth performance, carcass characteristics, serum biochemical profile, antioxidant status, and cecal microbial population in broilers.

Waleed Alhujaili, Mahmoud Kamal, Rania Ali El Hadi Mohamed, Nawal Al-Hoshani, Zakiah Nasser Almohawes, Shubash Chandra Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Waleed AlhujailiDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Taibah University, Al Madinah Al Munawwarah, 41321, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmoud KamalAnimal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza 12618, Egypt.
Rania Ali El Hadi MohamedDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: rasaddig@pnu.edu.sa.
Nawal Al-HoshaniDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Zakiah Nasser AlmohawesDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Shubash Chandra DasDepartment of Poultry Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This investigation aimed to assess the influence of lactic acid (OLA) and formic acid (OFA) as dietary acidifiers with antioxidant potential in broiler feed on growth performance, carcass traits, blood parameters (ALT, AST, total protein, albumin, globulin, and lipids), and cecal microbial populations. A total of 300 one-day-old unsexed Ross 308 broiler chicks (42.5 ± 1.2 g) were randomly assigned to five treatments in a completely randomized design, with 5 replicate pens per treatment and 12 chicks per replicate pen. The treatments were as outlined: control - basal diet without addition; OLA1 and OLA2 - basal diet with 2 and 4 g/kg of lactic acid; OFA1 and OFA2 - basal diet with 2 and 4 g/kg of formic acid, respectively. Organic acid inclusion did not significantly alter growth performance parameters or carcass yields (P > 0.05). However, serum biochemical profiles improved significantly (P < 0.05); AST, ALT, urea, and creatinine decreased, whereas total protein, albumin, and the A/G ratio increased, exhibiting prominent linear responses (P < 0.05). Antioxidant status was significantly enhanced (P < 0.05), evidenced by elevated GPx and GST activities, higher GSH concentration (peaking in OLA2 at 81.8 nmol/L), and reduced MDA levels across all acid-supplemented groups (P < 0.001). Furthermore, beneficial shifts in cecal microbial populations were observed, characterized by a significant reduction in total bacterial counts, total coliforms, E. coli, Salmonella spp., and Clostridium spp., alongside an increase in Lactobacilli (P < 0.05). In conclusion, while dietary lactic and formic acid supplementation did not improve broiler growth performance or carcass yields, they significantly strengthened systemic metabolism, enzymatic antioxidant defense, and cecal microbial equilibrium.

Indexed as

BloodGrowthGut microbiotaLactic and formic acidsOrganic acidsOxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID42721740
PMCPMC13584036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.