Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42663766›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026

Strengthening School Readiness for All: Impacts of New York City's Pre-K for All Professional Learning on Teacher Practice and Children's School Readiness.

Rachel M Abenavoli, Jessica A Siegel, Ashleigh I Aviles, Jeffrey Kitrosser, Adrienne Dominguez, Berta Bartoli, Jessica T Young, Jisoo Kim, Rebecca Davis, Kate Rockey and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rachel M AbenavoliChild Trends, Bethesda, MD, USA. rabenavoli@childtrends.org.
Jessica A SiegelStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ashleigh I AvilesNew York University, New York, NY, USA.
Jeffrey KitrosserNew York City Public Schools, New York, NY, USA.
Adrienne DominguezNew York City Public Schools, New York, NY, USA.
Berta BartoliNew York University, New York, NY, USA.
Jessica T YoungCUNY Graduate Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jisoo KimNew York University, New York, NY, USA.
Rebecca DavisMDRC, New York, NY, USA.
Kate RockeyNew York City Public Schools, New York, NY, USA.
Helen BarahalNew York City Public Schools, New York, NY, USA.
Josh WallackFord Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Elise CappellaNew York University, New York, NY, USA.
Pamela Morris-PerezNew York University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Institute of Education Sciences R305H170042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research-practice partnerships (RPPs) can be an effective strategy for bridging disconnects among research, policy, and practice, as they present unique opportunities for rigorous research that produces clear, actionable findings that can directly inform the work of governmental agencies on high-priority topics. This paper describes two interconnected randomized controlled trials conducted by a decade-long RPP between researchers at New York University (NYU) and New York City Public Schools (NYCPS) policy leaders in the Division of Early Childhood Education (DECE), starting at the launch of New York City's universal pre-K system. This RPP navigated opportunities and challenges for conducting rigorous research to evaluate professional learning (PL) for pre-K teachers assigned to "Explore," a math-focused PL approach (Study 1) or "Create," an arts-focused PL approach (Study 2). In each study, we examined impacts on classroom practice and quality (using observation data collected by NYCPS) and children's school readiness (using direct assessment data collected by NYU), relative to content-agnostic PL serving as a business-as-usual control. Results indicated that Explore did not have significant impacts (relative to control), likely because of low levels of implementation. In contrast, Create had several significant and substantively meaningful positive impacts (relative to control) on teacher practice, quality, and children's learning. Overall, our findings suggest that PL implemented by a large district at scale can have positive impacts when the PL model is robust, when PL has clear targets or focus, and when participation in PL is sufficient. We discuss how findings generated by our RPP have informed DECE's work, as well as challenges encountered conducting the research and utilizing findings, particularly during a mayoral transition. The study was pre-registered with Open Science Framework in July 2023.

Indexed as

Arts instructionMath instructionProfessional learningResearch-practice partnershipsSchool readinessTeacher practiceUniversal pre-K

Identifiers

PMID42663766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.