ArticleCureus2026
Effectiveness of Case-Based Learning Versus Lecture-Based Learning in Enhancing Critical Thinking and Retention in Pharmacology: A Mixed-Methods Cross-Sectional Study From Mauritius.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPharmacology is a well-established branch of medicine taught in the preclinical years, encompassing the study of drugs, their mechanisms of action, dosing, adverse effects, and therapeutic applications. The primary objective of this mixed-methods cross-sectional study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of case-based learning (CBL) versus lecture-based learning (LBL) in pharmacology at Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam Medical College, Mauritius. MATERIALS AND
methodsA mixed-methods cross-sectional study was conducted at Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam Medical College in Mauritius from September to December 2025. Quantitative data were processed and analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 31.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Qualitative data were analyzed using NVivo 15 software (QSR International, Melbourne, Australia) through inductive thematic analysis.
resultsA total of 318 of 336 students participated in the quantitative component of the study, yielding a response rate of 94.64%. The mean age of participants was 22.71 ± 1.56 years. Overall, 129 (78.2%) female and 134 (87.6%) male students preferred CBL, whereas 36 (21.8%) female and 19 (12.4%) male students preferred LBL, citing that it was easier to follow without prior preparation (p = 0.027). Similarly, 137 (83.0%) female and 139 (90.8%) male students preferred CBL, while 28 (17.0%) female and 14 (9.2%) male students preferred LBL for reducing confusion or misunderstanding about the topic (p = 0.040). Clinical-phase students were more likely to prefer CBL for future sessions compared with preclinical students (adjusted OR 3.720, 95% CI 1.095-12.637; p = 0.035). Male students were more likely than female students to report that CBL was easier to follow without prior preparation (adjusted OR 2.003, 95% CI 1.024-4.020; p = 0.040) and that it reduced confusion or misunderstanding (adjusted OR 1.968, 95% CI 1.074-3.608; p = 0.042). Thematic analysis of qualitative data generated six key themes: cognitive engagement, application, recall, metacognition, interaction, and perceptions of learning format.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that students in both preclinical and clinical semesters, and across genders, generally preferred CBL over traditional LBL. Participants reported that CBL was easier to follow without prior preparation and helped reduce confusion or misunderstanding in pharmacology learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.