Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42316159›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2026

The effects of flipped classroom versus lecture-based learning on academic performance and perceptions of classroom environment among nursing students: a randomized controlled trial.

Mahboubeh Sadat Yousefi, Mohsen Fooladzadeh Dehghan, Mahnaz Ilkhani, Rahimeh Khajoei, Saeide Heidari, Mozhgan Jokar

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mahboubeh Sadat YousefiDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran. mahboubeh.yousefi@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4491-4560
Mohsen Fooladzadeh DehghanDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.
Mahnaz IlkhaniDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Rahimeh KhajoeiDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Sirjan School of Medical Sciences, Sirjan, Iran.
Saeide HeidariDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Mozhgan JokarDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNursing students often struggle with the fluids and electrolytes course because of the complexity, extensive detail, and fleeting nature of the content. Evidence indicates that the flipped classroom approach can enhance learning and performance among students in the medical professions compared to traditional methods. This study aimed to compare the effects of two teaching approaches, the flipped classroom and traditional lecture-based learning, on nursing students' academic performance and perceptions of the classroom environment.

methodsThis was a single-blind, parallel-group, pretest-posttest randomized controlled trial. The study was conducted with 58 nursing students at Qom University of Medical Sciences, Iran, during the 2019-2020 academic year. Participants were randomly assigned using a computer-generated block randomization sequence to either the intervention group (flipped classroom, n = 29) or control group (lecture-based learning, n = 29). The primary outcome was academic performance, measured by researcher-developed 20-item multiple-choice knowledge test. The secondary outcome was perceptions of the classroom environment, assessed using the College and University Classroom Environment Inventory (CUCEI). Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics with SPSS version 26. All analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle and included all 58 randomized participants.

resultsThere was no statistically significant difference in the mean scores of knowledge test between the two groups prior to the intervention (t = 1.265, 95% CI: [-0.30, 1.33], P = 0.211). After controlling for pretest scores, ANCOVA revealed a significant and large effect of the flipped classroom on post-test knowledge (F = 104.719, P < 0.001, partial η² = 0.65). A one-way MANOVA on the seven CUCEI subscales yielded a significant multivariate effect (Pillai's Trace = 0.93, F = 109.30, P < 0.001, partial η² = 0.93). With a Bonferroni-corrected alpha of 0.007, the flipped classroom group demonstrated significantly higher scores on Satisfaction, Involvement, Task Orientation, and Innovation, while no significant differences were found for Personalization, Student Cohesiveness, and Individualization.

conclusionThe findings suggest that the flipped classroom approach can improve nursing students' academic performance and perceptions of the classroom environment. These results highlight the potential value of integrating active, student-centered pedagogies into nursing curricula. However, given the small sample size, short study duration, lack of long-term follow-up to assess knowledge retention, and single-institution design, further research with larger and more diverse samples is needed to confirm these results.

trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered in the Iranian Clinical Trials Registry (IRCT) with the trial number IRCT20240610062078N2 on December 21, 2025.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureateProblem-Based LearningStudents, NursingAdultEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansIranMaleSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultAcademic performanceClassroom environmentFlipped classroomNursing studentsPerceptionRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID42316159
PMCPMC13523480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.