ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
A Comparative Educational Intervention Study of Peer Teaching and Flipped Classroom Models in Pediatric Intensive Care Rotation.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Providing effective pediatric critical care education during short pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) rotations remains challenging due to high patient acuity, time-sensitive decision-making, and limited reflection time. This study aimed to compare the impact of peer teaching and flipped classroom models on educational outcomes for residents during PICU rotations. Methods: This single-center, non-randomized comparative educational intervention study included 76 residents rotating in the PICU at the Children's Hospital of Soochow University between January 2022 and October 2023. Residents participated in either peer teaching (Group A, n = 38) or flipped classroom teaching (Group B, n = 38). Outcomes were evaluated using theoretical examinations, Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) scores, and post-intervention questionnaires assessing self-perceived skill improvement and engagement. Results: There were no significant differences in theoretical examination scores (80.77 ± 6.29 vs 80.08 ± 7.29, p = 0.526) or mini-CEX performance (7.92 ± 0.82 vs 7.90 ± 0.73, p = 0.837) between the two groups. Residents in the peer teaching group reported greater improvements in communication skills, confidence, and problem-solving ability. In contrast, residents in the flipped classroom group perceived greater gains in conceptual understanding and teamwork. Most participants (92.1%) regularly accessed online lectures, and content relevance to clinical practice was rated highly (8.44 ± 1.85). Conclusion: Both peer teaching and flipped classroom approaches were effective in PICU resident education, each demonstrating distinct strengths in fostering different competencies. A blended educational strategy may further optimize learning outcomes during short-term critical care rotations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.