ArticleNPJ science of food2026
Establishment and validation of NQICD: a new nutrient profiling model for evaluating Chinese dishes.
Article in NPJ science of food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emergy-Based Sustainability Evaluation and Optimization Scenarios for 341 Chinese Home-Cooked Dishes.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the increase in dining out, high consumption of salt, oil, and sugar has led to deteriorating diet quality in China. We developed and validated the Nutritional Quality Index of Chinese Dishes (NQICD), a new nutrient profiling model for Chinese composite dishes, addressing a gap not covered by existing models. NQICD was based on seven domains. Its content validity was confirmed against the Dietary Guidelines for Chinese Residents (DGCR), and convergent validity against existing NP models. Criterion validity was assessed using a population-based cohort (n = 3629) with 12-year follow-up, linking i.NQICD to dietary quality, biomarkers, and health outcomes. In content validity, i.NQICD scores (range: 1-10) showed weak-to-moderate correlations with the DGCR (r: -0.39 to -0.21). In criterion validation, each 1-SD increase (≈1.8 points) was associated with lower body mass index (BMI) (-0.13 kg/m²), SBP (-1.69 mmHg), DBP (-1.05 mmHg), and HbA1c (-0.12%). Prospectively, after adjusting for key variables, a higher baseline i.NQICD score was associated with reduced risks of diabetes (HR 0.93, p = 0.024) and all‑cause mortality (HR 0.88, p = 0.011) over 12 years. The NQICD aligns with DGCR goals, demonstrates adequate validity for evaluating Chinese dishes, and can serve as a public health tool to assess their healthiness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.