ArticleBMC nursing2026
Evaluation the effectiveness of the multimodal situational blended teaching model in higher vocational pediatric nursing education: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith continuous advances in healthcare technologies and the growing societal demand for high-quality pediatric nursing care, the limitations of traditional lecture-based teaching methods in pediatric nursing education for higher vocational students have become increasingly evident. Teacher-centered, lecture-based instruction may be insufficient in fostering students' learning motivation, cultivating positive learning values, promoting active learning attitudes, and supporting the development of critical thinking skills. To address these challenges, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodal situational blended teaching model in higher vocational pediatric nursing course, with the goal of providing practical insights for improving the quality of nursing talent development.
methodsA quasi-experimental study was conducted using convenience sampling among two consecutive cohorts (2022 and 2023) of students enrolled in the three-year higher vocational nursing program at Guilin Medical University, China. The 2022 cohort served as the control group and received traditional lecture-based instruction, while the 2023 cohort constituted the intervention group and was taught using a multimodal situational blended teaching model. At the end of the semester, data on academic performance, learning values, learning engagement, critical thinking abilities, and satisfaction with course reform were collected via an online questionnaire administered through Wenjuanxing and analyzed quantitatively.
resultsThe intervention group demonstrated significantly higher scores than the control group in academic performance, learning values, learning engagement, and critical thinking abilities (all p < 0.05). They also reported significantly greater satisfaction with four dimensions of the course reform: overall satisfaction with the course delivery, satisfaction with the design and organization of practical components, satisfaction with the availability and quality of learning resources, and satisfaction with the effectiveness of teacher-student interactions and feedback mechanisms (all p < 0.05).
conclusionsThe multimodal situational blended teaching model was associated with better learning outcomes and higher satisfaction in higher vocational pediatric nursing education. However, the cross-sectional design and self-reported data preclude causal inference; longitudinal studies are needed to assess its long-term impact on competency development. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.