ReviewMicromachines2026
Heteroepitaxial 3C-SiC for MEMS Applications.
Review in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial for the Special Issue on SiC Based Miniaturized Devices, 3rd Edition.Micromachines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Silicon carbide (SiC) has emerged as a highly attractive material for microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) operating in harsh environments, owing to its outstanding mechanical, thermal, and chemical properties. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the advantages and limitations of SiC-based MEMS, with particular emphasis on the strong interdependence between material structure, mechanical properties, and epitaxial growth processes. The role of defects, residual stress, and crystal quality is discussed in relation to device performance and reliability. Special attention is devoted to cubic SiC grown on silicon substrates, highlighting how growth-induced features influence the mechanical response of micromachined structures. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of the quality factor (Q-factor) is presented for 3C-SiC (111)/Si resonators, including the development of analytical models and their validation through numerical simulations performed using COMSOL Multiphysics (Version 6.1). The necessity of incorporating anisotropic loss factors in numerical modeling is demonstrated to be essential for accurately describing the experimentally observed behavior. This review aims to provide design guidelines and modeling strategies for the optimization of SiC MEMS, supporting their further development for high-performance and extreme-environment applications, including pressure sensors, mechanical resonators and high-stress-tolerant sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.