ArticleJournal of religion and health2026
Cognitive, Spiritual, and Algorithmic Responsiveness in Teaching Scale (C-SARTS): Exploring Teachers' Cognitive, Ethical, and Spiritual Responsiveness in AI-Supported Secondary Education in Jordan.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study developed and psychometrically validated the Cognitive-Spiritual Algorithmic Responsiveness in Teaching Scale (C-SARTS) for AI-supported secondary education in Jordan. Using a sequential mixed-methods design, we generated and refined items through qualitative interviews and literature review, then administered the scale to 552 teachers. Exploratory factor analysis suggested a coherent four-factor solution-integrative multidimensional responsiveness, cognitive responsiveness in live pedagogy, spiritual responsiveness in teaching encounters, and algorithmic responsiveness in instructional design-which was subsequently confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis with acceptable fit indices. Reliability was strong across dimensions (α/ω/CR at or above conventional thresholds). Convergent and discriminant validity were largely satisfactory; one construct showed AVE slightly below 50 but met composite reliability criteria, indicating conservative yet acceptable convergence. Measurement invariance held across gender. Network-based exploratory graph analysis with bootstrap replications supported a stable four-dimensional structure, and a random-forest check highlighted the integrative dimension and items that combine AI-readable design with attention to students' psychosocial context as most influential. C-SARTS offers a concise, multidimensional measure of how teachers align cognitive, ethical-spiritual, and algorithmic considerations in AI-rich classrooms, supporting applications in educational research, teacher professional development, and ethically grounded technology integration in Jordanian secondary schools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42014539What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.