ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2010
Scientific Opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2010 update).
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- L.Fermentum CECT5716 and B.Breve CECT7263 on premature infants morbidities: a randomized clinical trial.Pediatric research · 2026Trial
- FTIR Spectroscopy Coupled with Principal Component Analysis for Rapid Screening of Melamine Adulteration in Brown Rice Flour.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sourdough Microbiota for Improving Bread Preservation and Safety: Main Directions and New Strategies.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Tackling transmission of infectious diseases: A probiotic-based system as a remedy for the spread of pathogenic and resistant microbes.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Review
- Cholesterol-Lowering Bioactive Foods and Nutraceuticals in Pediatrics: Clinical Evidence of Efficacy and Safety.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Milk and Its Derivatives as Sources of Components and Microorganisms with Health-Promoting Properties: Probiotics and Bioactive Peptides.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Effect of aAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- [Health Technology Assessment of the introduction of the Probiotic Cleaning Hygiene System (PCHS) in the Italian healthcare setting: update].Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2023Article
- Safety Assessment Systems for Microbial Starters Derived from Fermented Foods.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Effect ofNutrients · 2022Article
- Strategies for the Development of Bioprotective Cultures in Food Preservation.International journal of microbiology · 2022Review
- [Health Technology Assessment of the Probiotic Cleaning Hygiene System (PCHS)].Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2022Article
- Potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Effects of therapeutic probiotics on modulation of microRNAs.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2021Review
- Safety Evaluation of Yeasts With Probiotic Potential.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Article
- Article
- In vitro antimicrobial activities of Saudi honeys originating fromFood science & nutrition · 2020Article
- Constructing a human complex type N-linked glycosylation pathway in Kluyveromyces marxianus.PloS one · 2020Article
- Selection of carbohydrate-active probiotics from the gut of carnivorous fish fed plant-based diets.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Fighting AMR in the Healthcare Environment: Microbiome-Based Sanitation Approaches and Monitoring Tools.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
EFSA is requested to assess the safety of a broad range of biological agents (including microorganisms and viruses) in the context of notifications for market authorisation as sources of food and feed additives, enzymes and plant protection products. The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) concept was developed by EFSA for its own use to provide a generic risk assessment approach applicable across EFSA's scientific Panels, for biological agents notified for intentional use in the whole food chain. The safety of unambiguously defined biological agents at the highest taxonomic unit that is appropriate for the purpose for which an application is intended are assessed, considering if the body of knowledge is sufficient. Identified safety concerns for a taxonomic unit could be reflected as 'qualifications' when considered appropriate for an inclusion on the QPS list. The list of QPS recommended biological agents is reviewed and updated annually. The 2010 update reviews the previously assessed microorganisms including bacteria, yeasts, filamentous fungi and viruses used for plant protection purposes. The recommendations of biological agents of the previous year were confirmed in the current update. Qualifications relating to the agents recommended for QPS were reviewed, clarified and updated where necessary. Specific sections dealing with antibiotic resistance relevant for QPS recommended microorganisms and yeast were included. The methodology used for carrying out the annual review of the list of QPS recommended biological agents was detailed. A list of microbial species from previous notifications and as notified to EFSA, annexed in this opinion, includes information on taxonomic units which are or are not recommended for the QPS list. This list of notifications aims to summarize and maintain important information for future assessments and updates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.