ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The generative AI ethics landscape as seen by Chinese middle school students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid integration of Generative AI in education, understanding students' ethical perspectives is crucial for effective AI ethics education. Five hundred and ninety four middle school students' agreement levels on five AI ethical principles (beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, autonomy, explicability) adapted from previous research, and the rationales underlying their choices were investigated using a questionnaire. Results showed that students expressed the highest agreement with "beneficence" and "autonomy," though overall responses leaned toward neutrality. Independent AI use and family discussions predicted higher agreement; urban-rural differences were non-significant. Qualitative analysis identified themes in students' ethical reasoning. These findings offer evidence-based guidance for adolescent AI ethics education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.