ReviewMicromachines2026
A Review of the Machining Mechanisms in Field-Assisted Cutting of Brittle Materials.
Review in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of the Immersion Chemical-Mechanical Polishing Process for Gear.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Process Optimization and Predictive Modeling of Femtosecond Laser Precision Milling for Commercial PMMA Slices.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Stability and Dynamics of Milling Process During Cutter-Workpiece Engagement and Disengagement Stages.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Sustainable Approach for Improving Tool Life and Surface Quality During Diamond Cutting of Ultra-Low-Expansion Glass Using Laser Assistance.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Laser-Assisted Diamond Cutting for Low-Damage Fabrication of High-Q CaFMicromachines · 2026Article
- Heteroepitaxial 3C-SiC for MEMS Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Editorial for Future Trends in Ultra-Precision Machining.Micromachines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brittle materials such as single crystals, polycrystalline ceramics, and amorphous glass are indispensable in modern industry. Driven by improvements in equipment performance, the required fabrication precision for optical elements and devices has reached nanoscale and is steadily advancing toward atomic level. Despite their outstanding physical and chemical properties, fabricating a defect-free surface with nanometer-level roughness on brittle materials is challenging due to microcracking, brittle fracture and severe tool wear. In recent years, field-assisted cutting has emerged to overcome the bottleneck in ultra-precision cutting of brittle materials. This review summarizes investigations of material removal mechanisms of brittle materials in ultra-precision cutting and surveys representative field-assisted cutting technologies-including laser, vibration, magnetic field, and ion implantation assisted cutting-highlighting how these fields broaden ductile-regime machining and suppress the machining-induced defects. This review further discusses the emerging multi-field coupling strategies and outlines future research directions in machining mechanisms to enable high-efficiency, low-damage, and high-consistency manufacturing of brittle materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.