Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41867965›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Exploring the influence of AI self-study rooms on K-12 learners' motivation, self-regulation, enjoyment, and engagement.

Wei Li, Ya Xu, Le Yao, Yantong Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei LiDepartment of Design Media, Zhejiang Fashion Institute of Technology, Ningbo, China.
Ya XuCollege of Humanities, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Le YaoCollege of Humanities, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yantong LiuDepartment of Computer and Information Engineering, Kunsan National University, Gunsan, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the development of AI-based self-study rooms that may influence K-12 learners' motivation, engagement, enjoyment, and self-regulation. This study was guided by Zimmerman's self-regulated learning framework to explore whether AI-equipped self-study environments can foster more autonomous and effective learning compared to traditional self-study settings. Methods: A quasi-experimental design was conducted with 383 primary-school students in mainland China, randomly assigned to either an experimental group (AI self-study rooms) or a control group (traditional self-study). Over a 10-week period, participants completed standardized pre- and post-tests, as well as validated scales measuring motivation, engagement, enjoyment, and self-regulation. Data were analyzed using ANCOVA to control for baseline equivalences. Results: Findings revealed that students exposed to AI self-study rooms recorded notably higher post-intervention scores on all measured constructs than those in traditional self-study settings. ANCOVA results showed that group membership significantly affected motivation ( Conclusion: This study suggests that AI study rooms may be able to provide K-12 students with a more customized, responsive, and engaging learning experience that improves key elements of their learning. Future inquiries could employ longitudinal designs, diversify educational contexts, and integrate broader psychological variables to enrich understanding of how AI-driven tools might shape learners' trajectories over time.

Indexed as

AI educationartificial intelligenceengagementmotivationself-regulated learning

Identifiers

PMID41867965
PMCPMC13002848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.