ArticleJournal of food science2026
Aroma, Flavor, and Textural Drivers of Acceptance in Unflavored Pea Protein Isolates.
Article in Journal of food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aroma, Flavor, and Textural Drivers of Acceptance in Unflavored Pea Protein Isolates.Journal of food science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing popularity of plant-based proteins, particularly pea protein, is driven by health benefits and sustainability. However, despite the increasing demand, undesirable sensory attributes hinder consumer acceptance. This study aimed to identify the key sensory drivers of acceptance for unflavored pea protein isolates and to compare acceptance ratings between plant-based and animal-based protein consumers. Thirteen pea protein isolates were evaluated through descriptive analysis by a trained panel, assessing 19 sensory attributes including aroma, flavor, taste, and texture. Consumer acceptance ratings were evaluated by 134 participants, divided into plant- and animal-based protein consumers. Results indicated that flavor was the most impactful predictor of overall acceptance, followed by texture and aroma. Notably, no significant differences in acceptance ratings were observed between the two consumer groups, suggesting shared criteria for evaluating pea protein isolates. Internal preference mapping showed that product liking was driven primarily by the avoidance of negative attributes. Indeed, perceived sensations, including bitterness, cereal/grainy flavor, and astringency, adversely affected acceptance, whereas positive attributes included sweet taste and green pea flavor. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of optimizing sensory profiles to enhance consumer acceptance of pea protein as a versatile ingredient in various applications. Future research should focus on strategies to minimize undesirable sensory characteristics to broaden the appeal of pea protein products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.