ArticleScientific reports2026
Effect of the BOPPPS-based blended teaching model in undergraduate nursing education: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Bridge-in, Objective, Preassessment, Participatory Learning, Postassessment, and Summary-Based Instructional Model in Disaster Nursing: Quasi-Experimental Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of a BOPPPS-based peer instruction approach in undergraduate physiology: a quasi-experimental study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Service-learning using the BOPPPS model in TCM nursing education: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This quasi-experimental study was conducted with undergraduate nursing students at Xiangnan University in China between March 2023 and January 2024. Using a cluster allocation method, students in classes 1–2 were assigned to the conventional (lecture-based) teaching group, while students in classes 3–4 were assigned to the experimental group receiving BOPPPS-based blended teaching via the Chaoxing Learning Platform. The primary outcome was semester performance, with academic self-efficacy and learning engagement as secondary outcomes. A total of 193 participants (28 males) were enrolled: 97 in the BOPPPS group (mean age 19.89 ± 0.48 years; 13 males) and 96 in the conventional group (mean age 19.83 ± 0.47 years; 15 males). There was no statistically significant difference in the general information and academic performance between the two groups of students in the baseline survey (P > 0.05). Following the teaching intervention, outcomes were compared between the two groups. The BOPPPS group demonstrated significantly higher semester performance (89.73 ± 6.67 vs. 84.24 ± 6.20), academic self-efficacy scores (82.36 ± 15.83 vs. 72.02 ± 20.70), and learning engagement scores (89.75 ± 13.81 vs. 77.22 ± 23.99) than the conventional group (all P < 0.001). These results suggest that the BOPPPS-based blended teaching model appears to enhance nursing students’ semester performance, academic self-efficacy, and learning engagement compared with conventional lecture-based teaching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.