Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41641995›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026

Characterizing Introductory Biology instructors' understanding of metacognition and its role in supporting undergraduate student learning.

Carissa J Kohlwey, Jerzie Johnson, Simran Dhillon, Amy E Kulesza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carissa J KohlweyCenter for Life Sciences Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Jerzie JohnsonCenter for Life Sciences Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Simran DhillonCenter for Life Sciences Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Amy E KuleszaCenter for Life Sciences Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1650-8015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 that initiated the transition to online classrooms, metacognition has become increasingly essential for both instruction and student learning. In the post-pandemic environment, understanding how Introductory Biology instructors perceive fostering the development of students' metacognitive skills is necessary for supporting students who are struggling to adapt to change and to support instructors in understanding best teaching practices. This study used semi-structured interviews to explore how Introductory Biology instructors perceive their role in fostering the development of students' metacognitive skills and to identify areas where additional support through Teaching Professional Development is needed. The study characterized instructors' understanding of metacognitive skill development, their reported strategies for encouraging student metacognition, and the challenges and barriers they perceived to face when attempting to implement such practices. The research team developed the initial codes using emergent themes from the interview transcripts related to three research questions. Although the small sample size limits generalization, the voices of these instructors reveal common themes regarding their level of understanding of metacognition, the strategies they used, and the barriers they faced. These findings suggest that, while instructors recognize the importance of metacognition, their interpretations of the construct are often broad and variably aligned with theoretical definitions.

Indexed as

Biology instructorsmetacognitive knowledgemetacognitive pedagogyprofessional development

Identifiers

PMID41641995
PMCPMC13131018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.