Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41578610›Full record

ArticleMedical education2026

Mirrors and prisms: How interprofessional interactions influence medical students' professional identity formation.

Kelsey A Miller, Adam P Sawatsky, Andrea M Barker, Anique B H de Bruin, Martin V Pusic, Renée E Stalmeijer, Jonathan S Ilgen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kelsey A MillerDepartment of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0323-2048
Adam P SawatskyDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4050-7984
Andrea M BarkerDivision of Physician Assistant Education and Sciences, University of Utah and VA Salt Lake City Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3619-9368
Anique B H de BruinSchool of Health Professions Education, Department of Educational Development and Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5178-0287
Martin V PusicDepartment of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5236-6598
Renée E StalmeijerSchool of Health Professions Education, Department of Educational Development and Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8690-5326
Jonathan S IlgenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4590-6570

Funding

Boston Children's Hospital Office of Faculty Development/Basic & Clinical Translational Research Executive Committees Faculty Career Development Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProfessional identities impact professional boundaries and hierarchies, influencing how physicians approach collaboration. Despite the growing emphasis on developing students to become effective collaborators, little is known about how other health professionals (OHPs) shape students' professional identity formation (PIF). This study explored how interacting with OHPs during clinical care contributed to medical students' construction of what it means to be a physician.

methodsFor this constructivist grounded theory study, researchers conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with medical students during clinical clerkships. Students drew rich pictures representing their interactions with OHPs and described these pictures during their interviews. Interviews were iteratively conducted and analysed, enabling the research team to theorize how interacting with OHPs contributed to medical students' PIF.

resultsParticipants expressed a strong desire to contribute to patient care and described how interprofessional interactions provided opportunities to do so in ways aligned with their current capabilities. These opportunities were often more accessible than the roles and responsibilities of physicians, and participating alongside OHPs fostered participants' sense of their own developing capabilities and belonging on healthcare teams. Interactions with OHPs helped participants to see the expertise of OHPs and the value of collaborating with them in ways that shifted their focus away from becoming independent. Conceptually, participants' interactions with OHPs became both a mirror reflecting their present readiness to meaningfully contribute and a prism through which they could envision their future identities as physicians in new ways.

conclusionsInterprofessional interactions influenced medical students' current and future professional identities, enabling students to see themselves as contributors on health care teams and highlighting collaboration and interdependence as core attributes of the physician profession. These findings highlight opportunities to amplify the impact of interprofessional interactions on the PIF of medical students and the need for research into how OHPs view their roles in these processes.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsSocial IdentificationStudents, MedicalClinical ClerkshipCooperative BehaviorGrounded TheoryHumansPhysician's RoleSocial Group

Identifiers

PMID41578610
PMCPMC13441211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.