Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530478›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Teacher support enhances self-efficacy and learning outcomes in the age of AI.

Shan Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shan XiaChengdu Polytechnic, Chengdu, People's Republic of China. xiashan@cdp.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4083-5043

Funding

Co-funded by the Sichuan Foreign Languages and Literatures Research Center and Higher Education Press SCWVGJ25-20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing acceptance and adoption of generative AI in higher education, it remains unclear how this integration can improve the learning outcomes of college students. This study aims to gather empirical evidence on the impact of teacher support and student academic self-efficacy on learning outcomes in EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learning, utilizing generative AI. This quantitative study is based on the Social Cognitive Theory to assess students' attitudes, intentions, and behaviors toward employing generative AI in EFL learning. A questionnaire measuring teachers' affective support, teachers' capacity support, teachers' behavior support, students' academic self-efficacy, and learning outcomes was completed by 906 EFL students in a Chinese higher vocational college. A structural equation modelling study reveals that teachers' capacity support and behavior support can directly predict learners' academic self-efficacy and indirectly affect the students' learning outcomes. Meanwhile, higher levels of students' academic self-efficacy are associated with better academic learning outcomes. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of generative AI as a language-learning tool for EFL learners. Theoretically, it proves that the supportive environment and learners' positive internal psychological factors combine to produce improved learning achievement. Practically, students can make improvements in their English learning with more support from teachers and enhancement of their academic self-efficacy. Consequently, there should be teacher training guiding how to support students emotionally, skillfully, and practically in their English learning, whereas AI-specific pedagogy needs to be further explored to help students enhance their self-efficacy to achieve better learning outcomes.

Indexed as

LearningSelf EfficacyStudentsFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesGenerative AILearning outcomesSelf-efficacyTeacher support

Identifiers

PMID41530478
PMCPMC12876981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.