ArticleVeterinary research communications2025
Lactic acid bacteria: potentials in canine formulas for puppies.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lactic acid bacteria, potentially probiotic, in whole-grain pet biscuits: survival and technological potential of millet-based formulations (Pennisetum glaucum).Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of probiotics and natural nutraceuticals with demonstrated therapeutic effects for companion animals is becoming increasingly popular in the veterinary community. Probiotics are alternative to antibiotics, which produce adverse effects, such as promoting bacterial resistance and altering the intestinal microbial ecology and in turn affecting the animal's health. In this study, the in vitro safety and technological characteristics of previously isolated beneficial canine strains were evaluated for the design of a probiotic formulation for dogs. The screening of inhibitory substances production was performed in 100 isolates by plate diffusion technique. 30 strains were pre-selected to evaluate their in vitro safety and innocuity by phenotypic and genotypic antibiotic resistance and expression of pathogenicity enzymes related to virulence factors. Finally, 10 were selected to assay their tolerance to gastrointestinal conditions and stress situations such as high temperatures and solute concentrations by microplate assays. Compatibility between the selected strains was also determined in order to include them in a probiotic multi-strain formulation for canines. According to the results obtained, some strains showed inhibitory activity against common pathogens, and 38% were able to produce H₂O₂. Antibiotic resistance genes were detected in only one of the selected strains, none evidenced gelatinase or lecithinase activity and most isolates showed alpha and gamma hemolysis. Resistance to gastrointestinal tract and stress conditions was strain dependent. The compatible strains with complementary beneficial characteristics were: Lactobacillus johnsonii 67, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 74, Ligilactobacillus salivarius 84 and Pediococcus acidilactici 81 and are being included in the design of a probiotic formulas to be evaluated in small dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41364266What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.