Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41364266›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2025

Lactic acid bacteria: potentials in canine formulas for puppies.

Natalia Carrasco, María Hortencia Miranda, Cecilia Aristimuño Ficoseco, María Elena Fátima Nader-Macías, Jean Guy LeBlanc

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalia CarrascoCentro de Referencia para Lactobacilos (CERELA-CONICET-FML-FECIC), San Miguel de Tucumán, Chacabuco 145, CP4000, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3451-2062
María Hortencia MirandaCentro de Referencia para Lactobacilos (CERELA-CONICET-FML-FECIC), San Miguel de Tucumán, Chacabuco 145, CP4000, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5581-527X
Cecilia Aristimuño FicosecoCentro de Referencia para Lactobacilos (CERELA-CONICET-FML-FECIC), San Miguel de Tucumán, Chacabuco 145, CP4000, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2396-7751
María Elena Fátima Nader-MacíasCentro de Referencia para Lactobacilos (CERELA-CONICET-FML-FECIC), San Miguel de Tucumán, Chacabuco 145, CP4000, Argentina. fnader@cerela.org.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7526-1860
Jean Guy LeBlancCentro de Referencia para Lactobacilos (CERELA-CONICET-FML-FECIC), San Miguel de Tucumán, Chacabuco 145, CP4000, Argentina. leblanc@cerela.org.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4634-8630

Funding

Mincyt-Anpcyt 2019-00942 and 2021-00071MINCYT-ANPCYT: PICT 2018-00473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of probiotics and natural nutraceuticals with demonstrated therapeutic effects for companion animals is becoming increasingly popular in the veterinary community. Probiotics are alternative to antibiotics, which produce adverse effects, such as promoting bacterial resistance and altering the intestinal microbial ecology and in turn affecting the animal's health. In this study, the in vitro safety and technological characteristics of previously isolated beneficial canine strains were evaluated for the design of a probiotic formulation for dogs. The screening of inhibitory substances production was performed in 100 isolates by plate diffusion technique. 30 strains were pre-selected to evaluate their in vitro safety and innocuity by phenotypic and genotypic antibiotic resistance and expression of pathogenicity enzymes related to virulence factors. Finally, 10 were selected to assay their tolerance to gastrointestinal conditions and stress situations such as high temperatures and solute concentrations by microplate assays. Compatibility between the selected strains was also determined in order to include them in a probiotic multi-strain formulation for canines. According to the results obtained, some strains showed inhibitory activity against common pathogens, and 38% were able to produce H₂O₂. Antibiotic resistance genes were detected in only one of the selected strains, none evidenced gelatinase or lecithinase activity and most isolates showed alpha and gamma hemolysis. Resistance to gastrointestinal tract and stress conditions was strain dependent. The compatible strains with complementary beneficial characteristics were: Lactobacillus johnsonii 67, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 74, Ligilactobacillus salivarius 84 and Pediococcus acidilactici 81 and are being included in the design of a probiotic formulas to be evaluated in small dogs.

Indexed as

Animal FeedLactobacillalesProbioticsAnimalsDogsBeneficial characteristicsCanine probioticsInnocuityLactic acid bacteriaPuppies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.