Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41273312›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of educational psychology2026

Control-value appraisals and the emergence of students' boredom: An in situ perspective within lessons.

Richard Göllner, Kristina Kögler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of educational psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Richard GöllnerUniversity of Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9442-7616
Kristina KöglerUniversity of Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

University of Bamberg, Germany
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a growing body of research demonstrating that control and value appraisals predict students' experiences of boredom, less attention has been paid to appraisals arising from specific learning situations and their consequences for students' emotional responses.

aimsIn the present study, we disentangled students' individual differences from their momentary learning experiences to examine appraisal-boredom relations, including their reciprocal effects.

methodsWe analysed experience-sampling data from N = 95 secondary school students who provided repeated ratings of their comprehension, interest, and boredom during eight lessons over two consecutive curricular weeks. The data were examined using multilevel structural equation modelling with cross-lagged relations for students' momentary experiences. RESULTS AND

conclusionsWe found that higher interest was consistently associated with lower boredom. In contrast, comprehension showed a more complex pattern. Boredom due to overchallenge appeared to stem from stable individual differences, whereas boredom resulting from underchallenge emerged from students' momentary comprehension. Finally, analyses of reciprocal relations revealed that boredom experienced toward the end of a lesson predicted decreases in students' subsequent comprehension and interest, highlighting the potential for downwards spirals of disengagement within the classroom context.

Indexed as

BoredomLearningStudentsAdolescentFemaleHumansIndividualityMaleappraisal‐boredom relationscontrol‐value theoryexperience sampling

Identifiers

PMID41273312
PMCPMC13155033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.