ReviewAdvances in therapy2026
Study Designs and Crafting Endpoints for Gene Therapy Development Programs in Rare Disease: A Narrative Review.
Review in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalized drug discovery from rare diseases to cancer.npj drug discovery · 2026Review
- Rare disease clinical trials in Italy (2022-May 2026): current trends, future challenges, and the evolving role as reporting member state.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene therapies are emerging as a promising strategy for the treatment of rare genetic diseases, for which treatment options are often limited and do not address the underlying disease mechanisms. However, there are significant challenges for gene therapy programs, including defining a suitable first-in-human cohort and selecting endpoints with appropriate variability, sensitivity, reliability, and clinical meaningfulness; a systematic framework for the assessment and approval of these treatments is lacking. In this review, we share insights from 12 clinical development programs that culminated in recent approvals of gene therapies for rare genetic diseases (2016-2023). These approvals highlight useful strategies for navigating the unique challenges of gene therapy trials, including early and frequent engagement with regulatory bodies, incorporating the patient voice, selecting meaningful clinical outcome assessments and suitable controls, and leveraging well-matched real-world data to understand long-term efficacy, durability, and safety. By systematically documenting and analyzing detailed examples in this review, it becomes possible to derive data-driven solutions that can inform the design of future studies. Such solutions may diverge from prior assumptions or preconceptions but can provide a more evidence-based foundation for improving trial efficiency, and ultimately accelerate the development of urgently needed therapies for patients with rare genetic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.