SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2025

Tirzepatide for adults living with obesity.

Juan Va Franco, Yang Guo, Lucia B Varela, Zakariya Aqra, Murad Alhalahla, Mauricio Medina Rodriguez, Edison Leonardo Salvador Oscco, Bernarda Patiño Araujo, Susan Banda, Camila Micaela Escobar Liquitay and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025. The graph read 16 numbers from its abstract, feeding 5 cells of the map: it finds no clear difference in 5. Cited by 3 papers.

16numbers the graph read from it
5cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

Ratios

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0.250.5241 · no effect
Body weight & compositionfavours the comparator · against placebo · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
RR 3.602.44 to 5.30
SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS: Tirzepatide versus placebo (medium-term: 12 to 18 months) Tirzepatide likely results in a greater percentage reduction in body weight from baseline (mean difference (MD) -16.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) -18.91 to -13.14; 8 studies, 6317 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and an increase in the number of people achieving a 5% weight reduction (risk ratio (RR) 3.60, 95% CI 2.44 to 5.30; I2 = 86%; 5 studies, 4455 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Non-serious adverse eventstirzepatide vs placebofavours the comparator · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
RR 1.331.03 to 1.71
Tirzepatide may result in an increase in non-serious adverse events (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.71; 5 studies, 4582 participants; low-certainty evidence).
Non-serious adverse eventstirzepatide vs placebono clear difference · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
RR 1.050.98 to 1.11
Tirzepatide may result in an increase in non-serious adverse events (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.11; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence).
Body weight & compositionfavours the comparator · against placebo · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
RR 2.812.33 to 3.38
Tirzepatide versus placebo (long-term: 3.5 years) Tirzepatide likely results in a greater percentage reduction in body weight from baseline (MD -15.66, 95% CI -19.14 to -12.18; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and an increase in the number of people achieving a 5% weight reduction (RR 2.81, 95% CI 2.33 to 3.38; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Mortalitytirzepatide vs placebono clear difference · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
RR 0.790.34 to 1.83
Tirzepatide likely results in little to no difference in mortality (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.83; 7 studies, 5628 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)tirzepatide vs placebono clear difference · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
RR 0.750.34 to 1.66
Tirzepatide likely results in little to no difference in MACE (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.66; I² = 0%; 7 studies, 5628 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Adverse events leading to withdrawaltirzepatide vs placebofavours the comparator · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
RR 2.061.21 to 3.52
Tirzepatide may result in little to no difference in adverse events leading to withdrawal (RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.52; 8 studies, 6359 participants; low-certainty evidence).
Serious adverse eventstirzepatide vs placebono clear difference · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
RR 0.990.88 to 1.12
The evidence is very uncertain about the effect on serious adverse events (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.12; 8 studies, 6359 participants; very low-certainty evidence).
Adverse events leading to withdrawaltirzepatide vs placebono clear difference · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
RR 1.640.97 to 2.76
Tirzepatide may result in little to no difference in adverse events leading to withdrawal (RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.76; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence).
Mortalitytirzepatide vs placebono clear difference · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
RR 0.830.22 to 3.17
Tirzepatide may result in little to no difference in mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.22 to 3.17; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence).
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)tirzepatide vs placebono clear difference · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
RR 0.560.22 to 1.42
Tirzepatide likely results in little to no difference in MACE (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.42; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Serious adverse eventstirzepatide vs placebono clear difference · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
RR 1.140.79 to 1.65
The evidence is very uncertain about the effect on serious adverse events (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.65; 1 study, 1032 participants; very low-certainty evidence).

Differences

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
-19.112.00 · no effect
Percentage reduction in body weight from baselinetirzepatide vs placebofavours the treatment · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
Δ -15.7-19.1 to -12.2
Tirzepatide versus placebo (long-term: 3.5 years) Tirzepatide likely results in a greater percentage reduction in body weight from baseline (MD -15.66, 95% CI -19.14 to -12.18; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and an increase in the number of people achieving a 5% weight reduction (RR 2.81, 95% CI 2.33 to 3.38; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Percentage reduction in body weight from baselinetirzepatide vs placebofavours the treatment · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
Δ -16.0-18.9 to -13.1
SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS: Tirzepatide versus placebo (medium-term: 12 to 18 months) Tirzepatide likely results in a greater percentage reduction in body weight from baseline (mean difference (MD) -16.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) -18.91 to -13.14; 8 studies, 6317 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and an increase in the number of people achieving a 5% weight reduction (risk ratio (RR) 3.60, 95% CI 2.44 to 5.30; I2 = 86%; 5 studies, 4455 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Quality of life as measured by the IWQOL-Lite-CT physical function domaintirzepatide vs placebofavours the treatment · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
Δ 9.917.81 to 12.0
Tirzepatide likely results in little to no clinically important difference in quality of life as measured by the IWQOL-Lite-CT physical function domain (MD 9.91, 95% CI 7.81 to 12.02; 6 studies, 5020 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Quality of life as measured by SF-36 physical component scoretirzepatide vs placebono clear difference · obesityfeeds one cell of the map
Δ 2.700.00 to 5.40
Tirzepatide may result in little to no clinically important difference in quality of life as measured by SF-36 physical component score (MD 2.70, 95% CI 0.00 to 5.40; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

GIP/GLP-1 & amylin agonists×adverse events & safety

InconclusiveOpen on the map →What to test next →

4 readable studies in this cell: 2 favour the treatment, 2 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.00contested · 0 families support, 3 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT0498257592 enrolled · 2021
Δ -0.30-0.79 to 0.19
NCT0408133755 enrolled · 2020
Δ -0.03-0.05 to -0.02
NCT0405055342 enrolled · 2020
Δ -0.89-4.10 to 2.33

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

GIP/GLP-1 & amylin agonists×body weight & composition

InconclusiveOpen on the map →What to test next →

28 readable studies in this cell: 27 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
1.00replicated · 19 families support, 0 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
Δ -17.3-18.1 to -16.6
NCT041846222,539 enrolled · 2019
Δ -13.5-14.6 to -12.5
NCT037306622,002 enrolled · 2018
Δ -9.00-9.80 to -8.30
NCT039879191,879 enrolled · 2019
Δ -1.70-2.60 to -0.70
NCT038829701,444 enrolled · 2019
Δ -9.80-10.8 to -8.80
NCT045379231,428 enrolled · 2020
Δ -10.7-11.5 to -9.90
Δ -10.4-11.2 to -9.50
NCT04657003938 enrolled · 2021
Δ -10.1-11.5 to -8.80
NCT04093752917 enrolled · 2019
Δ -6.50-7.40 to -5.60
NCT04660643783 enrolled · 2021
Δ -21.4-22.9 to -20.0
NCT05822830751 enrolled · 2023
Δ -6.50-8.10 to -4.90
NCT04847557731 enrolled · 2021
Δ -11.6-12.8 to -10.4

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

GIP/GLP-1 & amylin agonists×all-cause mortality

InconclusiveOpen on the map →What to test next →

2 readable studies in this cell: 1 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.35one trial · 1 family supports, 0 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
NCT04847557731 enrolled · 2021
HR 1.250.63 to 2.45

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

GIP/GLP-1 & amylin agonists×quality of life & behaviour

InconclusiveOpen on the map →What to test next →

15 readable studies in this cell: 7 favour the treatment, 6 find no difference, 2 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 4 families support, 3 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
0 · no effect
NCT041846222,539 enrolled · 2019
Δ 7.705.60 to 9.80
NCT039879191,879 enrolled · 2019
Δ -0.24-0.50 to 0.03
NCT038829701,444 enrolled · 2019
Δ -0.26-0.57 to 0.05
NCT045379231,428 enrolled · 2020
Δ 1.500.50 to 2.60
NCT04657003938 enrolled · 2021
Δ 1.800.70 to 2.90
NCT04093752917 enrolled · 2019
Δ -0.47-0.81 to -0.13
NCT04660643783 enrolled · 2021
Δ 9.406.80 to 12.0
NCT04657016579 enrolled · 2021
Δ 12.89.70 to 16.0
NCT05412004469 enrolled · 2022
Δ 28.718.3 to 39.2
NCT05564039282 enrolled · 2022
Δ 4.10-1.00 to 9.20
NCT04844918267 enrolled · 2021
Δ 1.300.20 to 2.30
NCT05024032210 enrolled · 2021
Δ 1.200.00 to 2.30

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

GIP/GLP-1 & amylin agonists×cardiovascular events

InconclusiveOpen on the map →What to test next →

2 readable studies in this cell: 2 favour the treatment, 0 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50one trial · 1 family supports, 0 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
NCT04847557731 enrolled · 2021
HR 0.620.41 to 0.95
NCT05564039282 enrolled · 2022
OR 20.48.40 to 49.8

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Juan Va FrancoCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Germany/UK - Düsseldorf Subunit, Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Yang GuoCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Germany/UK - Düsseldorf Subunit, Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Lucia B VarelaCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Iberoamérica, Research Department, Universidad del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Zakariya AqraCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Germany/UK - Düsseldorf Subunit, Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Murad AlhalahlaCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Germany/UK - Düsseldorf Subunit, Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Mauricio Medina RodriguezEquipo de Seguridad Alimentaria, Distrito Especial de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia.
Edison Leonardo Salvador OsccoFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa, Arequipa, Peru.
Bernarda Patiño AraujoClínica Bariátrica Napoleón Salgado, Quito, Ecuador.
Susan BandaEvidence Informed Decision-Making Center, Department of Community and Environmental Health, School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Camila Micaela Escobar LiquitayCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Iberoamérica, Research Department, Universidad del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Javier BracchiglioneCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Iberoamérica, Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Studies (CIESAL), Universidad de Valparaíso, Viña del Mar, Chile.
Nicolás MezaCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Iberoamérica, Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Studies (CIESAL), Universidad de Valparaíso, Viña del Mar, Chile.
Eva MadridCochrane Evidence Synthesis Unit Iberoamérica, Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Studies (CIESAL), Universidad de Valparaíso, Viña del Mar, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-8095-5549

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

rationaleObesity is a complex chronic condition linked to various comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia, with a significant global burden. Standard treatments, such as diet, exercise and behavioural changes, often have limited effects and poor compliance. Pharmacological options, including glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) dual agonists, show promise for individuals with obesity. This is one of three reviews investigating different GIP/GLP1-RAs for adults living with obesity.

objectivesTo assess the effects of the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, tirzepatide, for adults living with obesity. SEARCH

methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and two trials registries on 17 December 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on adults with obesity that compared tirzepatide at any dose with placebo, structured lifestyle modification programmes, another anti-obesity medication or other GLP-1RAs or GIP/GLP-1RAs, with a minimum follow-up of six months. OUTCOMES: Critical outcomes were weight, adverse events, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), quality of life, and mortality. Important outcomes included waist circumference and other obesity-related comorbidities. RISK OF BIAS: We used the original version of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias (RoB 1). SYNTHESIS

methodsWe synthesised results for each outcome using meta-analysis with a random-effects model. Where this was not possible, we described the results narratively. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. The main comparison of interest in the review is tirzepatide versus placebo. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included nine RCTs with 7111 participants, aged 36.1 to 65.25 years, primarily from middle- and high-income countries. The main comparison, tirzepatide versus placebo, is based on eight studies; one study compared tirzepatide with semaglutide. Studies included participants with weight-related comorbidities. Seven studies focused on specific subgroups, including type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, chronic heart failure, obstructive sleep apnoea (after a long pretreatment phase), and different racial populations. Tirzepatide was injected once a week, with dosing ranging from 5 mg to 15 mg. All the studies had medium-term follow-ups, and one had a long-term follow-up. All nine studies reported a major role of the drug manufacturer in their design, conduct, analysis, or writing. SYNTHESIS OF

resultsTirzepatide versus placebo (medium-term: 12 to 18 months) Tirzepatide likely results in a greater percentage reduction in body weight from baseline (mean difference (MD) -16.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) -18.91 to -13.14; 8 studies, 6317 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and an increase in the number of people achieving a 5% weight reduction (risk ratio (RR) 3.60, 95% CI 2.44 to 5.30; I2 = 86%; 5 studies, 4455 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide may result in an increase in non-serious adverse events (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.71; 5 studies, 4582 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect on serious adverse events (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.12; 8 studies, 6359 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide may result in little to no difference in adverse events leading to withdrawal (RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.52; 8 studies, 6359 participants; low-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide likely results in little to no difference in MACE (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.66; I² = 0%; 7 studies, 5628 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide likely results in little to no clinically important difference in quality of life as measured by the IWQOL-Lite-CT physical function domain (MD 9.91, 95% CI 7.81 to 12.02; 6 studies, 5020 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide likely results in little to no difference in mortality (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.83; 7 studies, 5628 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide versus placebo (long-term: 3.5 years) Tirzepatide likely results in a greater percentage reduction in body weight from baseline (MD -15.66, 95% CI -19.14 to -12.18; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and an increase in the number of people achieving a 5% weight reduction (RR 2.81, 95% CI 2.33 to 3.38; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide may result in an increase in non-serious adverse events (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.11; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect on serious adverse events (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.65; 1 study, 1032 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide may result in little to no difference in adverse events leading to withdrawal (RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.76; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide likely results in little to no difference in MACE (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.42; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide may result in little to no clinically important difference in quality of life as measured by SF-36 physical component score (MD 2.70, 95% CI 0.00 to 5.40; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide may result in little to no difference in mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.22 to 3.17; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS'

conclusionsTirzepatide likely results in weight loss at medium-term follow-up, and this initial weight loss is likely to be sustained at longer-term follow-up. The long-term impact on other patient-important outcomes may be limited or uncertain. The certainty of the evidence on events leading to withdrawal at medium- and long-term follow-up is low, which might further limit our understanding of the sustainability of the initial effects. All the included studies were funded by the drug manufacturer, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest. Further independent studies are needed, particularly in underrepresented populations, to better understand the broader effects of tirzepatide in the management of obesity.

fundingWorld Health Organization (WHO) REGISTRATION: Protocol (2022) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015092 Updated Protocol (2025): PROSPERO CRD420250654193.

Indexed as

Anti-Obesity AgentsGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsObesityTirzepatideAdultBiasGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Obesity AgentsGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsTirzepatide

Identifiers

PMID41161687
PMCPMC12571520

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.