SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2025
Tirzepatide for adults living with obesity.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025. The graph read 16 numbers from its abstract, feeding 5 cells of the map: it finds no clear difference in 5. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
Ratios
SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS: Tirzepatide versus placebo (medium-term: 12 to 18 months) Tirzepatide likely results in a greater percentage reduction in body weight from baseline (mean difference (MD) -16.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) -18.91 to -13.14; 8 studies, 6317 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and an increase in the number of people achieving a 5% weight reduction (risk ratio (RR) 3.60, 95% CI 2.44 to 5.30; I2 = 86%; 5 studies, 4455 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Tirzepatide may result in an increase in non-serious adverse events (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.71; 5 studies, 4582 participants; low-certainty evidence).
Tirzepatide may result in an increase in non-serious adverse events (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.11; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence).
Tirzepatide versus placebo (long-term: 3.5 years) Tirzepatide likely results in a greater percentage reduction in body weight from baseline (MD -15.66, 95% CI -19.14 to -12.18; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and an increase in the number of people achieving a 5% weight reduction (RR 2.81, 95% CI 2.33 to 3.38; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Tirzepatide likely results in little to no difference in mortality (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.83; 7 studies, 5628 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Tirzepatide likely results in little to no difference in MACE (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.66; I² = 0%; 7 studies, 5628 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Tirzepatide may result in little to no difference in adverse events leading to withdrawal (RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.52; 8 studies, 6359 participants; low-certainty evidence).
The evidence is very uncertain about the effect on serious adverse events (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.12; 8 studies, 6359 participants; very low-certainty evidence).
Tirzepatide may result in little to no difference in adverse events leading to withdrawal (RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.76; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence).
Tirzepatide may result in little to no difference in mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.22 to 3.17; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence).
Tirzepatide likely results in little to no difference in MACE (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.42; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
The evidence is very uncertain about the effect on serious adverse events (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.65; 1 study, 1032 participants; very low-certainty evidence).
Differences
Tirzepatide versus placebo (long-term: 3.5 years) Tirzepatide likely results in a greater percentage reduction in body weight from baseline (MD -15.66, 95% CI -19.14 to -12.18; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and an increase in the number of people achieving a 5% weight reduction (RR 2.81, 95% CI 2.33 to 3.38; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS: Tirzepatide versus placebo (medium-term: 12 to 18 months) Tirzepatide likely results in a greater percentage reduction in body weight from baseline (mean difference (MD) -16.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) -18.91 to -13.14; 8 studies, 6317 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and an increase in the number of people achieving a 5% weight reduction (risk ratio (RR) 3.60, 95% CI 2.44 to 5.30; I2 = 86%; 5 studies, 4455 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Tirzepatide likely results in little to no clinically important difference in quality of life as measured by the IWQOL-Lite-CT physical function domain (MD 9.91, 95% CI 7.81 to 12.02; 6 studies, 5020 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).
Tirzepatide may result in little to no clinically important difference in quality of life as measured by SF-36 physical component score (MD 2.70, 95% CI 0.00 to 5.40; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence).
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
GIP/GLP-1 & amylin agonists×adverse events & safety
InconclusiveOpen on the map →What to test next →4 readable studies in this cell: 2 favour the treatment, 2 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
GIP/GLP-1 & amylin agonists×body weight & composition
InconclusiveOpen on the map →What to test next →28 readable studies in this cell: 27 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
GIP/GLP-1 & amylin agonists×all-cause mortality
InconclusiveOpen on the map →What to test next →2 readable studies in this cell: 1 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
GIP/GLP-1 & amylin agonists×quality of life & behaviour
InconclusiveOpen on the map →What to test next →15 readable studies in this cell: 7 favour the treatment, 6 find no difference, 2 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
GIP/GLP-1 & amylin agonists×cardiovascular events
InconclusiveOpen on the map →What to test next →2 readable studies in this cell: 2 favour the treatment, 0 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating incretin-based therapies into comprehensive obesity care: an EASO position statement.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
- Patient Experiences With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Real-Life Data of Tirzepatide Use to Support Lifestyle Modification in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome.Nutrients · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
rationaleObesity is a complex chronic condition linked to various comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia, with a significant global burden. Standard treatments, such as diet, exercise and behavioural changes, often have limited effects and poor compliance. Pharmacological options, including glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) dual agonists, show promise for individuals with obesity. This is one of three reviews investigating different GIP/GLP1-RAs for adults living with obesity.
objectivesTo assess the effects of the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, tirzepatide, for adults living with obesity. SEARCH
methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and two trials registries on 17 December 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on adults with obesity that compared tirzepatide at any dose with placebo, structured lifestyle modification programmes, another anti-obesity medication or other GLP-1RAs or GIP/GLP-1RAs, with a minimum follow-up of six months. OUTCOMES: Critical outcomes were weight, adverse events, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), quality of life, and mortality. Important outcomes included waist circumference and other obesity-related comorbidities. RISK OF BIAS: We used the original version of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias (RoB 1). SYNTHESIS
methodsWe synthesised results for each outcome using meta-analysis with a random-effects model. Where this was not possible, we described the results narratively. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. The main comparison of interest in the review is tirzepatide versus placebo. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included nine RCTs with 7111 participants, aged 36.1 to 65.25 years, primarily from middle- and high-income countries. The main comparison, tirzepatide versus placebo, is based on eight studies; one study compared tirzepatide with semaglutide. Studies included participants with weight-related comorbidities. Seven studies focused on specific subgroups, including type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, chronic heart failure, obstructive sleep apnoea (after a long pretreatment phase), and different racial populations. Tirzepatide was injected once a week, with dosing ranging from 5 mg to 15 mg. All the studies had medium-term follow-ups, and one had a long-term follow-up. All nine studies reported a major role of the drug manufacturer in their design, conduct, analysis, or writing. SYNTHESIS OF
resultsTirzepatide versus placebo (medium-term: 12 to 18 months) Tirzepatide likely results in a greater percentage reduction in body weight from baseline (mean difference (MD) -16.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) -18.91 to -13.14; 8 studies, 6317 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and an increase in the number of people achieving a 5% weight reduction (risk ratio (RR) 3.60, 95% CI 2.44 to 5.30; I2 = 86%; 5 studies, 4455 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide may result in an increase in non-serious adverse events (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.71; 5 studies, 4582 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect on serious adverse events (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.12; 8 studies, 6359 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide may result in little to no difference in adverse events leading to withdrawal (RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.52; 8 studies, 6359 participants; low-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide likely results in little to no difference in MACE (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.66; I² = 0%; 7 studies, 5628 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide likely results in little to no clinically important difference in quality of life as measured by the IWQOL-Lite-CT physical function domain (MD 9.91, 95% CI 7.81 to 12.02; 6 studies, 5020 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide likely results in little to no difference in mortality (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.83; 7 studies, 5628 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide versus placebo (long-term: 3.5 years) Tirzepatide likely results in a greater percentage reduction in body weight from baseline (MD -15.66, 95% CI -19.14 to -12.18; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and an increase in the number of people achieving a 5% weight reduction (RR 2.81, 95% CI 2.33 to 3.38; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide may result in an increase in non-serious adverse events (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.11; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect on serious adverse events (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.65; 1 study, 1032 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide may result in little to no difference in adverse events leading to withdrawal (RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.76; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide likely results in little to no difference in MACE (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.42; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide may result in little to no clinically important difference in quality of life as measured by SF-36 physical component score (MD 2.70, 95% CI 0.00 to 5.40; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence). Tirzepatide may result in little to no difference in mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.22 to 3.17; 1 study, 1032 participants; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS'
conclusionsTirzepatide likely results in weight loss at medium-term follow-up, and this initial weight loss is likely to be sustained at longer-term follow-up. The long-term impact on other patient-important outcomes may be limited or uncertain. The certainty of the evidence on events leading to withdrawal at medium- and long-term follow-up is low, which might further limit our understanding of the sustainability of the initial effects. All the included studies were funded by the drug manufacturer, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest. Further independent studies are needed, particularly in underrepresented populations, to better understand the broader effects of tirzepatide in the management of obesity.
fundingWorld Health Organization (WHO) REGISTRATION: Protocol (2022) DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015092 Updated Protocol (2025): PROSPERO CRD420250654193.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.