Who was studied, and how
Ten numbers in the abstract
Where each one falls
Where it lands on the map
What it changes
Among 2 other studies
The trial randomly assignedassigned by chance
Lowered percentage reduction in body weight−16.0
Increased non-serious adverse events+33%
Raised adverse events leading to withdrawal2.1×
randomisedthe abstract, start to end
… from baseline (mean difference (MD) -16.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) -18.91 to -13.14; 8 studies, 6317 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and an increase in the number of people achieving a 5% weight reduction (risk ratio (RR) 3.60, 95% CI 2.44 to 5.30; I2 = 86%; …
… in non-serious adverse events (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.71; 5 …
… the effect on serious adverse events (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.12; 8 …
… adverse events leading to withdrawal (RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.52; 8 …
… in little to no difference in MACE (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.66; I² = 0%; …
… physical function domain (MD 9.91, 95% CI 7.81 to 12.02; 6 …
… little to no difference in mortality (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.83; 7 …
… in body weight from baseline (MD -15.66, 95% CI -19.14 to -12.18; 1 study, 1032 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and an increase in the number of people achieving a 5% weight reduction (RR 2.81, 95% CI 2.33 to 3.38; 1 study, …
GIP/GLP-1 & amylin agonists × adverse events & safetyharms?mixed
GIP/GLP-1 & amylin agonists × body weight & compositionhelps?replicated
GIP/GLP-1 & amylin agonists × all-cause mortalityhelps?one trial