ArticleFood chemistry: X2025
Differential analysis of aroma fingerprints of roasted pork from different breeds: A complementary approach using GC-IMS, GC-O-MS, and GC×GC-MS.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In China, limited knowledge of suitable pig breeds for roasting has hindered pork industrialization. The aroma profiles of roasted pork from different breeds were analyzed using sensory evaluation and multidimensional mass spectrometry. The distinct fingerprint differences were observed, with roasted meat from Min pigs (MIP) showing the greatest variation. Compared with Nanyang black pigs (NBP), Landrace pigs (LAP), Junan indigenous pigs (JUP), and Wujin pigs (WUP), the roasted pork from MIP exhibited the most intense sensory intensity, especially in terms of roasty, meaty, and fatty notes. Thirty-one key aroma compounds were identified, with pyrazines especially 3-ethyl-2,5-dimethylpyrazine, contributing most to the roasty aroma. The partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was an effective method for distinguishing the roasted pork from different breeds, with no overlap among the samples. Notably, the 3,5-diethyl-2-methylpyrazine emerged as a unique marker. This work provides a robust method for selecting pig breeds suited for roasting applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.