ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2025
Using the Situated Learning-Guided Educational Framework to Teach Anatomy of the Infratemporal Fossa and Retromandibular Region.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Head and neck anatomy is a complex topic for students to learn and educators to teach. The current, most common pedagogical approach is student-conducted dissection. However, dissection of this region can be difficult, may be stressful, and might not optimally impart the foundational knowledge necessary to understand clinical scenarios. To address these challenges, we developed an instructor-guided, situated learning workshop using prosections of the infratemporal fossa and retromandibular region. This workshop aimed to reduce learner stress and improve their knowledge of these anatomic areas. Methods: Twenty-four first-year medical students, who were enrolled in a dissection-based anatomy course, participated in the 40-minute, instructor-facilitated workshop. Students completed a survey and a pre/postworkshop test to gauge perceived stress levels and knowledge retention. Mean values of the pre/postworshop tests were compared using a paired two-sample Results: Workshop participation significantly improved student learning of head and neck anatomic subregions. Postworkshop knowledge scores were significantly higher than preworkshop scores (mean of 8.75 [95% CI, 8.12-9.38] vs. 4.79 [95% CI, 3.68-5.90]; Discussion: Our findings suggest that a prosection-centered, instructor-guided workshop is an effective and low-stress approach for teaching students complex head and neck anatomy. This workshop can serve as an alternative to, or enhancement of, student-conducted dissection of the area. Although originally designed for medical students, the approach may also benefit learners in other health professions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.