ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Integrating Cacao Physicochemical-Sensory Profiles via Gaussian Processes Crowd Learning and Localized Annotator Trustworthiness.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Textural Properties and Nonlinear Regulatory Pattern Analysis of 3D-Printed Dough Containing Konjac Glucomannan.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the intricate relationship between sensory perception and physicochemical properties of cacao-based products is crucial for advancing quality control and driving product innovation. However, effectively integrating these heterogeneous data sources poses a significant challenge, particularly when sensory evaluations are derived from low-quality, subjective, and often inconsistent annotations provided by multiple experts. We propose a comprehensive framework that leverages a correlated chained Gaussian processes model for learning from crowds, termed MAR-CCGP, specifically designed for a customized Casa Luker database that integrates sensory and physicochemical data on cacao-based products. By formulating sensory evaluations as regression tasks, our approach enables the estimation of continuous perceptual scores from physicochemical inputs, while concurrently inferring the latent, input-dependent reliability of each annotator. To address the inherent noise, subjectivity, and non-stationarity in expert-generated sensory data, we introduce a three-stage methodology: (i) construction of an integrated database that unifies physicochemical parameters with corresponding sensory descriptors; (ii) application of a MAR-CCGP model to infer the underlying ground truth from noisy, crowd-sourced, and non-stationary sensory annotations; and (iii) development of a novel localized expert trustworthiness approach, also based on MAR-CCGP, which dynamically adjusts for variations in annotator consistency across the input space. Our approach provides a robust, interpretable, and scalable solution for learning from heterogeneous and noisy sensory data, establishing a principled foundation for advancing data-driven sensory analysis and product optimization in the food science domain. We validate the effectiveness of our method through a series of experiments on both semi-synthetic data and a novel real-world dataset developed in collaboration with Casa Luker, which integrates sensory evaluations with detailed physicochemical profiles of cacao-based products. Compared to state-of-the-art learning-from-crowds baselines, our framework consistently achieves superior predictive performance and more precise annotator reliability estimation, demonstrating its efficacy in multi-annotator regression settings. Of note, our unique combination of a novel database, robust noisy-data regression, and input-dependent trust scoring sets MAR-CCGP apart from existing approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.