ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Exploring the Failed Implementation of an Entrustable Professional Activities-Based Curriculum for Pediatric Residency: "It's What We Always Asked For, And Now Nobody Does It." A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medical education has been experiencing a transition from time- to competency-based. Since their introduction by Olle ten Cate in 2005, entrustable professional activities are a part of this process. We implemented a set of EPAs for the first 3 years of training at our hospital, encompassed by informational materials for trainees and supervisors. Objectives: Our objective was to assess barriers and facilitators for the implementation of entrustable professional activities in pediatric residency in a German tertiary hospital. Furthermore, our aim was to explore how they foster self-regulated learning and feedback, and to identify barriers and facilitators on the path to more confidence and safety. Methods: We applied a qualitative approach with focus-group discussions (adhering to COREQ guidelines), 3 each with residents and supervisors. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and de-identified. Data analysis was conducted based on qualitative content analysis. Results: Three months after the implementation, no resident had fulfilled the required assessments. In the discussions, we identified barriers to and facilitators of the process. Both may be attributed to internal and external factors. The concept was supported by residents and supervisors, but time, priorities in the clinical routine, lack of initiative, and an inhibition on the part of the residents to approach the supervisors were the main reasons for the concept to fail. We identified a higher degree of structure, as well as commitment and accountability, as possible facilitators. Conclusion: Entrustable professional activities are a promising means of promoting self-regulated learning and a positive feedback culture to increase confidence and safety in clinical practice. Our findings expose the factors that disrupt or promote this process. Our data provide guidance for implementation in a setting with little experience with this tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.