ArticleGene therapy2025
Gene editing for Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 taking advantage of the human ATXN3L paralog as replacement gene.
Article in Gene therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is a rare neurodegenerative disease caused by a CAG expansion of the ataxin-3 gene (ATXN3). SCA3 patients suffer from ataxia, spasticity and dystonia in mid-adulthood, with spinocerebellar dysfunction and degeneration. As a monogenic disease for which only symptomatic treatment is available, ATXN3 is an attractive target for gene editing. We used the KamiCas9, a self-inactivating gene editing system, to explore gene editing strategies suitable for all SCA3 patients. We first tested the deletion of exon 10 or the introduction of a premature stop codon into exon 9. High editing events were observed in vitro, but efficiency was very low in SCA3 transgenic mice. We then evaluated an ablate-and-replace strategy. The ablate experiments resulted in 55 ± 18% cerebellar editing of the ATXN3 gene. A human ATXN3L paralog, expressed in the brains of SCA3 patients, may act as a natural, CRISPR-resistant replacement gene. In a proof-of-principle study, ablate and ablate-and-replace strategies were evaluated in SCA3 transgenic mice. Two months after injection, similar editing efficiencies were obtained in the ablate and ablate-and-replace groups. Immunofluorescence and RT-qPCR analyses of cerebellar markers support the development of this strategy for SCA3 treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.