ArticleBMC medical education2025
First year nursing students' knowledge, skill levels and learning persistence in nursing practices: a comparison between classical lecture and flipped classroom.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFlipped Classroom Model (FCM) is a proposed method which is a novel and student-centered teaching strategy for encouraging nursing students to engage in the learning process. This study was aimed to evaluate the impact of the FCM on nursing students' knowledge, skill levels and persistence of learning.
designThis controlled quasi-experimental study was carried out with 71 first-year nursing students (35 experimental / 36 control).
methodsThe data were collected between February and April 2018 and the study was completed in January 2021. The data were collected using student information form, and knowledge test which was applied as pre-test, post-test and persistence test, as well as skill evaluation checklists including blood pressure measurement (BPM), drug preparation (DP), nasogastric tube insertion (NTI) and blood glucose measurement (BGM) with a glucometer. The students in the experimental group took the Nursing Fundamentals (NF) lesson with the FCM and the students in the control group with traditional teaching methods.
resultsThe students in the experimental group had higher scores from the post and persistence tests of the knowledge test compared to the control group addition, the skill scores of the experimental group for all of the skill applications in the first follow-up and persistence follow-up were higher than the control group.
conclusionFCM has a positive effect on the knowledge and skill levels of nursing students and provides persistence in acquired knowledge and skills. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.