ArticleFood science of animal resources2025
Evaluating Physical and Qualitative Properties of Lamb Meat Fed Different Levels of Neutral Detergent Fiber.
Article in Food science of animal resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative effect of feeding Tifton 85 hay and Pornunça hay as roughage on the performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of feedlot lambs.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic and Meat Quality Differences in Longissimus Dorsi Muscle of Surgically Castrated Three-Year-Old Kazakh Horses.Biology · 2026Article
- Effects of feeding pelleted complete diets containing palm fronds on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intraruminal fermentation, rumen histomorphology, carcass traits, and economic profitability in Awassi lambs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Carcass Trait, Physicochemical, Microstructure, and Fatty Acid Profile of Lamb Meat Fed Different Levels of Tamanu (Calophyllum inophyllum) Kernel Cake.Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan GakkaihoArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content in pelleted complete diets on the weight gain, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of lambs. A total of 72 lambs (12±1 weeks old) were randomly assigned to three dietary groups: Diet 1 (20.98% NDF), Diet 2 (28.23% NDF), and Diet 3 (32.82% NDF), with 8 replicates as the experimental unit. Weight gain parameters were recorded over 84 days. At the end of the trial, carcass characteristics, body components, wholesale cuts, fat depot metrics, and physical separation were evaluated. In addition, the physical, chemical, and fatty acid profiles of the meat and the qualitative meat characteristics were assessed. All data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and regression analysis. Lambs fed Diet 2 exhibited superior overall weight gain and improved carcass characteristics, including higher slaughter weight, empty weight, hot carcass weight, cold carcass weight, and carcass compactness index. The amounts of back fat, omental fat, mesenteric fat, meat percentage, and trimmings were also higher in Diet 2 than in the other groups. In terms of meat quality, Diet 2 resulted in lower shear force and a higher myofibril fragmentation index, indicating higher tenderness, along with substantially reduced cooking loss indicating improved meat quality. In addition, lambs fed Diet 2 had higher crude protein and polyunsaturated fatty acids content, while saturated fatty acid content decreased. In conclusion, these findings suggest that an NDF level of 28.23% in lamb diets optimizes weight gain, improves carcass characteristics, and enhances meat quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.