Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625430›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The impact of multidimensional excessive social media use on academic performance: the moderating role of mindfulness.

Xu Ma, Qi Liu, Wen Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xu Ma *School of Media and Communication, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan, China.
Qi Liu *School of Film and Media, Guangxi Arts University, Nanning, China.
Wen ZhangSchool of Journalism and Culture Communication, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigates the negative impact of excessive social media use among college students on learning burnout and academic performance, categorizing excessive use into three types: excessive social, excessive hedonic, and excessive cognitive. Based on the SSO (Stressor-Strain-Outcome) framework, the research examines the effects of these three types of excessive use on learning burnout and academic performance. It further explores the mediating role of learning burnout and the moderating effects of mindfulness in mitigating these negative outcomes. Method: A total of 532 valid responses were collected via an online survey using standardized self-report measures to assess excessive social media use, learning burnout, academic performance, and mindfulness. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 for descriptive statistics and moderation analysis, while AMOS 26.0 was employed for structural equation modeling and mediation testing. Results: Excessive social and hedonic use significantly increased learning burnout, while excessive cognitive use reduced it. Learning burnout negatively impacted academic performance and mediated the effects of all three types of social media use. Mindfulness moderated these relationships, weakening the adverse effects of excessive social media use. Discussion: The study reveals distinct effects of different types of excessive social media use on learning burnout and academic performance, underscoring the protective role of mindfulness. These findings offer valuable insights for developing interventions to enhance academic performance among college students.

Indexed as

academic performanceexcessive social media uselearning burnoutmindfulnessmoderating effect

Identifiers

PMID40625430
PMCPMC12231663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.