Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40447424›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Entrustable professional activities in nursing education: a scoping review.

Jonas Pietsch, Asja Maaz, Jan Kottner

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonas PietschCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3904-0036
Asja MaazCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8697-4460
Jan KottnerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany jan.kottner@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0750-3818

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEntrustable professional activities (EPAs) have been used in undergraduate and graduate medical education and in other health professions for a long time. They are regarded as a suitable way for bridging the gap between competency-based education and actual work tasks in the workplace. In nursing education, EPA development started later, and it is unclear which EPAs have been developed and implemented yet. This scoping review aims to identify which EPAs have been developed in nursing education, which of these have even been implemented and what the empirical evidence supports any effects of implementation.

designScoping review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and EMBASE via OVID, CINAHL and ERIC via EBSCOhost were searched for the period 1 January 1995 to 31 December 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Publication period from the first mention of EPAs in 1995 to 2023, no language restrictions, all types of literature if they had a clear mention of EPAs, all academic nursing education fields, EPAs had to be mentioned in the title or abstract. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Screening was conducted in a two-stage process with two authors. 13 suitable articles were included which describe either the development, implementation or assessment of EPAs.

resultsResults indicated that EPAs have been developed in 16 areas of nursing education, including special areas such as palliative care or emergency/intensive care. The activities health status assessment, care measures, leadership/management, diagnoses, care plans and protocols, emergency care measures and participation in diagnostics and/or therapy were described most often. In 4 out of 13 cases, EPAs were implemented. Described evidence indicated that the use of EPAs improved critical thinking, promoted flexibility in teaching and led to a mindset change.

conclusionsEPAs are increasingly developed and implemented in nursing education. There seem to be overlaps between EPAs mainly covering the steps of the nursing care process.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCompetency-Based EducationEducation, NursingHumansClinical CompetenceHealth EducationNursing research

Identifiers

PMID40447424
PMCPMC12128411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.