Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40407584›Full record

ReviewPediatric reports2025

Mindfulness in Mental Health and Psychiatric Disorders of Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Bruno Daniel Carneiro, Daniel Humberto Pozza, José Tiago Costa-Pereira, Isaura Tavares

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bruno Daniel CarneiroDepartment of Biomedicine, Unit of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3434-2247
Daniel Humberto PozzaDepartment of Biomedicine, Unit of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2119-4479
José Tiago Costa-PereiraDepartment of Biomedicine, Unit of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5623-8531
Isaura TavaresDepartment of Biomedicine, Unit of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5696-1239

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs) are important tools to address mental health issues in children and adolescents. However, previous studies provided variable results that suggest that the effectiveness of those third-wave Cognitive Behavioral Therapies remains uncertain.

objectivesThe main objective is to assess the impact of MBIs on anxiety, depression, and stress in children and adolescents. The secondary objective is to examine the modalities of MBIs used, the duration of interventions, and potential confounding factors, such as age.

methodsA comprehensive search of multiple databases was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of MBIs on mental health outcomes in children and adolescents. The research was registered in PROSPERO, adhered to PRISMA guidelines, employed the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and calculated the effect sizes using mean differences.

resultsThirteen RCTs were included; ten were identified as having some concerns, while three were classified as having a low risk of bias. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) demonstrated a small positive effect on depression and anxiety, while non-specific MBIs showed a moderate positive effect both on depression and anxiety. Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) was effective in reducing anxiety, depression (moderate positive effects on both), and stress symptoms. In one study, no significant improvements were seen on both anxiety and depression (for MBCT) and in another study on anxiety (for MBCT/MBSR). The meta-analysis did not identify a significant effect of mindfulness interventions on depression or anxiety. The high heterogeneity suggests varying outcomes, requiring further study of moderating factors.

conclusionsWhile some studies suggest benefits from MBIs, mainly MBCT's ability to improve mental health outcomes in children and adolescents, their overall efficacy remains uncertain due to the high heterogeneity. The findings underscore the importance of considering the intervention type, duration, and moderating factors, such as age, when implementing MBIs.

Indexed as

adolescentsanxietychildrendepressionmental healthmindfulnessmindfulness-based cognitive therapymindfulness-based stress reductionpsychiatric disordersrandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID40407584
PMCPMC12101429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.