Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40372568›Full record

ReviewThe ultrasound journal2025

Concepts for point-of-care ultrasound training in low resource settings: a scoping review.

Friedrich Eppel, Friederike Hunstig, Sabine Bélard, Benno Kreuels

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ultrasound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Friedrich EppelInstitute of International Health, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Friederike HunstigResearch Group Neglected Diseases and Envenoming, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Sabine Bélard *Institute of Tropical Medicine, University of Tübingen, Wilhelmstr. 27, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.
Benno Kreuels *Research Group Neglected Diseases and Envenoming, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany. kreuels@bnitm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2315-8954

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a potent diagnostic tool especially in resource-limited settings. The implementation of POCUS diagnostics requires adequate training of POCUS operators. This scoping review aimed to identify and describe POCUS training concepts that have been applied in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS AND

findingsAll studies on diagnostic POCUS training in LMICs that could be found in the Cochrane, Embase, Google Scholar, and Medline databases up to July 6, 2023, were included and data was extracted for descriptive analysis. The review protocol was registered at OSF https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8FQJW . A total of 53 publications were included with 59% of studies (n = 31) conducted in Africa and 23% (n = 12) in Asia. The majority of studies (n = 41, 81%) described short courses amongst which 40% were one-off sessions and 60% described longitudinal trainings. Curricula were mostly related to emergency medicine and obstetrics and organ-focused protocols (lung n = 29 (54%), cardiac n = 28 (53%), obstetric n = 23 (43%)). Trainees were largely medical doctors and clinical officers with minimal or absent ultrasound skills. Training challenges included resource constraints and lack of context adaptation. Best practice recommendations included focus on hands-on training, low trainer to trainee ratio, protected training time, online training options, use of local trainers, short and concise training manuals in print, continuous supervision and early and on-going evaluation, as well as tele-mentoring.

conclusionsContext integration and focus on local needs, trainer availability and suitability, durable equipment and maintenance, as well as emphasis on hands on training including patients with relevant pathology, were key aspects for targeted and sustainable POCUS training in LMICs identified in this review.

Indexed as

LMICPOCUSPoint of care ultrasoundTraining

Identifiers

PMID40372568
PMCPMC12081813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.