ArticleMedical science educator2025
Third-Party Resources: The New Wave of Medical Education.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Board exam preparation resource trends in academic health sciences libraries serving colleges of osteopathic medicine programs.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2026Article
- GenAI and Faculty Collaboration Support Feasible Development of Curriculum-Aligned Open-Access Board-Style Questions.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- The Use of Retrieval Practice in the Health Professions: A State-of-the-Art Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-stakes examinations are an integral part of medical education. To practice in the United States, students must pass the U.S. Medical Licensing Examinations (USMLE). The heightened emphasis on teaching and learning in accordance with USMLE-style examinations presents a challenge for both medical educators and students. There has been a surge in third-party resources that entice students with shortcut methods, such as flashcards and videos, to help them pass these exams. Medical school curricula continue to evolve aiming to prepare students for their increasingly technology-filled world. These innovations continue to go beyond those offered within the traditional curriculum, and with that, the manner in which students expand their knowledge base has evolved. Medical students ubiquitously access third-party resources out of a perceived necessity to use them to perform well in board exams. This perception has been prompted by studies demonstrating their efficacy in increasing USMLE Step scores. These third-party resources are replacing the use of textbooks for learning. They offer various benefits that may seem more attractive to most students than the presented medical curriculum. This article highlights some of the advantages and drawbacks of third-party resources, offering insight into why many medical students may gravitate towards them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.