ReviewMicromachines2025
Advanced Robotics for the Next-Generation of Cardiac Interventions.
Review in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Role of the Cardiothoracic Surgeon in the Age of AI-Are the Robots Going to Take Our Jobs?Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Neural Minimum-Distance Estimation for Collision-Aware Operation of Multi-Arm Laparoscopy Surgical Robots Through Learning-from-Simulation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optoacoustically augmented magnetic guidewire for radiation-free minimally invasive therapies.Science advances · 2026Article
- Augmented and Mixed Reality in Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Emerging Image-Guided Navigation Techniques for Cardiovascular Interventions: A Scoping Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Robotic Systems in Cardiovascular Interventions: Evolving Platforms and the Path Forward.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With an increasing number of elderly individuals, the demand for advanced technologies to treat cardiac diseases has become more critical than ever. Additionally, there is a pressing need to reduce the learning curve for cardiac interventionalists to keep pace with the rapid development of new types of procedures and devices and to expand the adoption of established procedures in more hospitals. This comprehensive review aims to shed light on recent advancements in novel robotic systems for cardiac interventions. To do so, this review provides a brief overview of the history of previously developed robotic systems and describes the necessity for advanced technologies for cardiac interventions to address the technological limitations of current systems. Moreover, this review explores the potential of cutting-edge technologies and methods in developing the next generation of intra-procedure autonomous navigation. Each highlighted topic undergoes a critical analysis to evaluate its technical limitations and the challenges that must be addressed for successful clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.