Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40170174›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychology2025

An analysis of the empirical research on SL/FL teaching and learning based on positive psychology: a systematic literature review.

Jia Miao, Xin Tian, Lina Zhang, Baoling Zhang, Li Ma

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jia MiaoSchool of Foreign Language, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.
Xin TianSchool of Foreign Language, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.
Lina ZhangTianjin NO.1 High School, Tianjin, China.
Baoling ZhangFaculty of Education, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.
Li MaSchool of Management, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China. 1306602579@qq.com.

Funding

National Office for Education Sciences Planning BHA240098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the growing attention received by research on second language or foreign language (SL/FL) learning from the perspective of positive psychology (PP), a crucial gap persists. Over the past decade (2013-2022), scholars have yet to comprehensively elucidate how PP affects SL/FL learning outcomes. Specifically, the full - scale impact of PP on various aspects of language learning, such as different language skills (listening, speaking, reading, writing) and learners at diverse educational levels, remains unclear. Additionally, the underlying psychological and educational mechanisms through which PP exerts its influence on SL/FL learning have not been thoroughly explored. In the present study, a systematic literature review was conducted to review and analyze the empirical studies on SL/FL teaching and learning from the perspective of positive psychology. By analyzing 45 studies, the research objects, language and psychological dimensions and the research design were collected systematically. The findings showed that: (1) as a relative new research field, the number of publications is increasing rapidly, and the future development momentum is strong; (1) the research topics focus on the relationship between PP and SL/FL learning, the intervention and moderating effects of PP on SL/FL learning; (2) about research design, the research objects are mainly college students with a wide distribution of majors; the research method is mainly quantitative research, and mixed research is constantly developing; (3) the research results showed that PP is associated with students' language performance and can predict performance. PP can also increase students' English learning engagement and well-being. The present study provided a comprehensive review and also gave some suggestions for future research.

Indexed as

LearningMultilingualismPsychology, PositiveTeachingEmpirical ResearchHumansPositive psychologySL/FL learningSystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID40170174
PMCPMC11959754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.