Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144088›Full record

ReviewMedical science educator2025

The Application of Flipped Classroom Strategies in Medical Education: A Review and Recommendations.

Priti L Mishall, Eiman M Abdel Meguid, Ihsan A Elkhider, Mohammed K Khalil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Priti L MishallDepartment of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5012-6574
Eiman M Abdel MeguidCentre for Biomedical Sciences Education, School of Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Dentistry & Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, UK.
Ihsan A ElkhiderUniversity of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC 29605 USA.
Mohammed K KhalilDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC 29605 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6474-0460

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of a flipped classroom (FC) instructional method has been expanding in medical education. Despite recent interest in FC pedagogy, little is known about optimal FC implementation strategies in medical education and their impact on learning outcomes. This article aimed to outline the educational theories that guide the design of the flipped instruction method and review the relevant literature to provide evidence-based recommendations for planning, designing, developing, implementing, and evaluating FC instruction in medical education. The review incorporates evidence-based literature that highlights students' performance outcomes and perceptions of the FC instruction method in medical education.

Indexed as

Active learningBlended learningCritical thinkingFlipped classroomMedical education

Identifiers

PMID40144088
PMCPMC11933548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.