Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40032452›Full record

ArticleFood research international (Ottawa, Ont.)2025

Texture profile analysis and rheology of plant-based and animal meat.

Reese A Dunne, Ethan C Darwin, Valerie A Perez Medina, Marc E Levenston, Skyler R St Pierre, Ellen Kuhl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The meatball matchup: Plant vs. animal proteins on campus.Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reese A DunneDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Ethan C DarwinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Valerie A Perez MedinaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Marc E LevenstonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Skyler R St PierreDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Ellen KuhlDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: ekuhl@stanford.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-based meat can help combat climate change and health risks associated with high meat consumption. To create adequate mimics of animal meats, plant-based meats must match in mouthfeel, taste, and texture. The gold standard to characterize the texture of meat is the double compression test, but this test suffers from a lack of standardization and reporting inconsistencies. Here we characterize the texture of five plant-based and three animal meats using texture profile analysis and rheology, and report ten mechanical features associated with each product's elasticity, viscosity, and loss of integrity. Our findings suggest that, of all ten features, the stiffness, storage, and loss moduli are the most meaningful and consistent parameter to report, while other parameters suffer from a lack of interpretability and inconsistent definitions. We find that the sample stiffness varies by an order of magnitude, from 418.9 ± 41.7 kPa for plant-based turkey to 56.7 ± 14.1 kPa for tofu. Similarly, the storage and loss moduli vary from 50.4 ± 4.1 kPa and 25.3 ± 3.0 kPa for plant-based turkey to 5.7 ± 0.5 kPa and 1.3 ± 0.1 kPa for tofu. All three animal products, animal turkey, sausage, and hotdog, consistently rank in between these two extremes. Our results suggest that-with the right ingredients, additives, and formulation-modern food fabrication techniques can create plant-based meats that successfully replicate the full viscoelastic texture spectrum of processed animal meat.

Indexed as

MeatMeat ProductsRheologyAnimalsElasticityFood HandlingViscosityElasticityMeatPlant-basedRheologyStiffnessTexture profile analysisViscosity

Identifiers

PMID40032452
PMCPMC11885209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.