ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2025
Statement on the update of maximum residue levels (MRLs) for copper compounds in light of the EFSA scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of the health-based guidance values (HBGVs) and exposure assessment from all sources.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Copper Compounds: A Narrative and Regulatory Review of Agricultural Uses, Risks, and Environmental Assessment.Toxics · 2026Review
- The 2024 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- The 2023 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Statement on the update of maximum residue levels (MRLs) for copper compounds in light of the EFSA scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of the health-based guidance values (HBGVs) and exposure assessment from all sources.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In compliance with Article 43 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) reviewed the maximum residue levels (MRLs) for copper compounds in light of the EFSA Scientific Committee opinion on the re-evaluation of the health-based guidance values (HBGVs) and exposure assessment from all sources. Based on the exposure calculations performed according to three different scenarios, the updated occurrence data and the residues from the new intended uses are not expected to have an impact on the chronic exposure calculations conducted under the framework of the EFSA Scientific Committee assessment. Therefore, the conclusions of the previous assessment by EFSA Scientific Committee are still valid. Since the current copper exposure is expected to cover all sources of copper, including the uses of copper as plant protection products (PPPs), it can be concluded that the authorised PPP uses for copper compounds and the new intended PPP uses present no health risk for the population, including children. Due to copper being also a micronutrient and ubiquitous in the environment, as requested in the mandate, the dietary risk assessment was performed following a different approach than the standard methodology for the dietary risk assessment of pesticide residues in the framework of setting and reviewing MRLs under Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 and in the peer review of pesticides under Regulation (EU) No 1107/2009. Therefore, all MRL proposals are suggested for further consideration by risk managers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.