Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39852383›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2025

Heat Tolerance Differences Between Hu Sheep and Hu Crossbred Sheep in Microbial Community Structure and Metabolism.

Jing-Da Yuan, Li-Wei Wang, Shao-Yin Fu, Ri-Ge-Li-Tu E, Xiao-Qi Ren, Hua Sun, Fang Liu, Biao Wang, Jiang-Hong An, Meng-Ran Zhao and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Proteomics- and Metabolomics-Based Investigation of the Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jing-Da YuanInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.
Li-Wei WangInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.
Shao-Yin FuInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.
Ri-Ge-Li-Tu EInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.
Xiao-Qi RenInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.
Hua SunInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.
Fang LiuInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.
Biao WangInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.
Jiang-Hong AnInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.
Meng-Ran ZhaoInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.
Jiang-Feng HeInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.
Xiao-Long HeInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China.

Funding

Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology Plan Project 2022JBGS0012Innovation Fund of Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Science 2023CXYJJM03Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2023QN03019the Erdos Major Project of Science & Technology ZD20232314the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Mutton Sheep industry technology system none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe frequent occurrence of extreme temperature events causes significant economic losses to the livestock industry. Therefore, delving into the differences in the physiological and molecular mechanisms of heat stress across different sheep breeds is crucial for developing effective management and breeding strategies.

methodsThis study explores the differences in heat tolerance mechanisms between Hu sheep and Xinggao sheep by comparing their growth performance under normal and heat stress conditions, as well as examining the differences in physiological, biochemical, and antioxidant indicators related to heat tolerance, serum metabolomics, and gut microbiomics in a heat stress environment.

resultsThe results indicate that with changes in the temperature-humidity index (THI), Hu sheep exhibit superior stability in respiratory rate (RR) and rectal temperature (RT) fluctuations compared to Xinggao sheep. In terms of biochemical indicators and antioxidant capacity, the levels of creatinine (Cr) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in Hu sheep serum are significantly higher than those in Xinggao sheep. In comparison, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels are significantly lower. Metabolomic results showed that, compared to Hu sheep, Xinggao sheep exhibited higher cortisol (COR) and dopamine (DA) levels under heat stress conditions, a stronger lipid mobilization capacity, and elevated levels of tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle-related metabolites. Furthermore, gut microbiome analysis results indicate that Hu sheep demonstrate stronger cellulose degradation capabilities, as evidenced by significantly higher abundances of microorganisms such as

conclusionsIn summary, Hu sheep exhibit stronger heat tolerance compared to Xinggao sheep. These findings provide an important theoretical basis for the breeding and selection of heat-tolerant meat sheep varieties and offer strong support for the region's livestock industry in addressing the challenges posed by global warming.

Indexed as

gut microbiotaheat stressmeat sheepmetabolomethermotolerance

Identifiers

PMID39852383
PMCPMC11768064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.