Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39722647›Full record

Observational studyMuscle & nerve2025

Risdiplam in Adult Patients With 5q Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Single-Center Longitudinal Study.

Maria Gavriilaki, Maria Moschou, Maria Pagiantza, Marianthi Arnaoutoglou, Vasilios Kimiskidis

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Muscle & nerve, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Risdiplam therapy in adult patients with Spinal muscular Atrophy (SMA). A 24-month-real-world experience at a single muscular centre.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria Gavriilaki1st Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1958-0063
Maria Moschou1st Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Maria PagiantzaSchool of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Marianthi Arnaoutoglou1st Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Vasilios Kimiskidis1st Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3335-3019

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/

aimsRisdiplam was the first orally administered drug approved to treat spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Efficacy in adults is based on short-term observational studies. This longitudinal study aimed to examine risdiplam's efficacy and safety in adults over a long period of follow-up.

methodsAll eligible SMA patients ≥ 16 years old, followed at the Muscular Dystrophy Association Hellas Neuromuscular Diseases Unit between April 2021 and December 2023, were included. We prospectively evaluated motor function, muscle strength, and pulmonary function before and after 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months of treatment. Laboratory assessments and patient-reported adverse events were recorded.

resultsOverall, 14 patients (18-57 years, 93% treatment-naive) received risdiplam for a median period of 28.5 months (range 6-30). There were statistically significant improvements in the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (mean difference [MD] 1.5 [95%CI 0.49-2.42]), Revised Upper Limb Module (MD 1.6 [95%CI 0.54-2.73]), Motor Function Measurement-32 (MD 2.7[95%CI 1.52-3.93]), Medical Research Council scores of the upper (MD 3 [95%CI 0.8-5.2]), and lower (MD 1.7 [95%CI 0.1-3.3]) limbs (all p ≤ 0.05). Eighty-two percent of patients achieved a clinically meaningful improvement (CMI) in at least one scale. Overall, CMI occurred earlier in type 3 patients. SMA functional rating scale and respiratory function tests remained stable over time. Fifty-seven percent of patients did not report any adverse events. None discontinued treatment. DISCUSSION: Risdiplam treatment over 30 months resulted in overall CMI in most treated adult SMA type 2 or 3 patients. Outpatient drug administration and overall patient management proved feasible and safe. Larger studies are warranted.

Indexed as

Muscular Atrophy, SpinalSpinal Muscular Atrophies of ChildhoodAdolescentAdultAzo CompoundsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthPyrimidinesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAzo CompoundsPyrimidinesRisdiplamadult spinal muscular atrophybiomarkersnervous system diseasesRisdiplamtherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID39722647
PMCPMC11799401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.