Observational studyMuscle & nerve2025
Risdiplam in Adult Patients With 5q Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Single-Center Longitudinal Study.
Observational study in Muscle & nerve, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and effectiveness of risdiplam in adults with spinal muscular atrophy: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Ten years of disease-modifying therapy in spinal muscular atrophy: lessons learned and future directions.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Risdiplam treatment in adults with spinal muscular atrophy: a single-center, real-world study.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Quantitative Whole-Body Muscle MRI in Adults With Spinal Muscular Atrophy-A Sensitive Tool for Long-Time Evaluation of Disease Progression.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Risdiplam therapy in adult patients with Spinal muscular Atrophy (SMA). A 24-month-real-world experience at a single muscular centre.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2026Article
- A real-world, multicentre, epidemiological study in Czech and Slovak adults with spinal muscular atrophy treated with risdiplam.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Matched-pair analysis of motor outcomes in adults with spinal muscular atrophy on nusinersen vs. risdiplam.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of risdiplam in adults with 5q-associated spinal muscular atrophy: a nationwide observational cohort study in Austria.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Assessment of safety and efficacy of risdiplam treatment in adults with spinal muscular atrophy.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsRisdiplam was the first orally administered drug approved to treat spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Efficacy in adults is based on short-term observational studies. This longitudinal study aimed to examine risdiplam's efficacy and safety in adults over a long period of follow-up.
methodsAll eligible SMA patients ≥ 16 years old, followed at the Muscular Dystrophy Association Hellas Neuromuscular Diseases Unit between April 2021 and December 2023, were included. We prospectively evaluated motor function, muscle strength, and pulmonary function before and after 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months of treatment. Laboratory assessments and patient-reported adverse events were recorded.
resultsOverall, 14 patients (18-57 years, 93% treatment-naive) received risdiplam for a median period of 28.5 months (range 6-30). There were statistically significant improvements in the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (mean difference [MD] 1.5 [95%CI 0.49-2.42]), Revised Upper Limb Module (MD 1.6 [95%CI 0.54-2.73]), Motor Function Measurement-32 (MD 2.7[95%CI 1.52-3.93]), Medical Research Council scores of the upper (MD 3 [95%CI 0.8-5.2]), and lower (MD 1.7 [95%CI 0.1-3.3]) limbs (all p ≤ 0.05). Eighty-two percent of patients achieved a clinically meaningful improvement (CMI) in at least one scale. Overall, CMI occurred earlier in type 3 patients. SMA functional rating scale and respiratory function tests remained stable over time. Fifty-seven percent of patients did not report any adverse events. None discontinued treatment. DISCUSSION: Risdiplam treatment over 30 months resulted in overall CMI in most treated adult SMA type 2 or 3 patients. Outpatient drug administration and overall patient management proved feasible and safe. Larger studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.